thedm (5064) - Fort Wayne, USA - APR 19, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: JUN 4, 2003 This brew poured a medium head of small to large white bubbles with a good lacing. Its body is a beautiful amber brown color with carbonated bubbles rising up the side of the glass. I smelled an aroma of hops and citrus. It has a fizzy hoppy taste that starts off slightly bitter and finishes slightly bitter too. Not a bad brew but it could be better.
adv (22) - Milan, ITALY - APR 14, 2003
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Too much body to be an outstanding Pale Ale and too sweet to be a Bitter. A good beer but not very well style-defined, in my opinion
rickgordon (3846) - Göteborg, SWEDEN - APR 13, 2003
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Toffee/amber colored. A blend of band-aid in the flavor. Bitter aftertaste.
Frank (3292) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - APR 12, 2003
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I was afraid of skunk so I tried the nitro-can rather than the clear bottle. Really gorgeous. Red, thin head with sheets of lace. Strong malt and surgical gauze aroma. Based almost entirely on sweet malt. Some hops in the finish. I need to try this without the nitro-can tastelessness.
kook (2033) - Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA - APR 11, 2003
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: OCT 19, 2003 Can: Pours clear yellow edging on amber, small white head. Malty aroma with floral smell (hops) coming through. Not all that strong though. Nice taste, well balanced sweetness. Malty, with a bitter finish to it. Floral/grassy hop flavour too. Thin-medium body. Rerate 16/10 tap: Pretty much the same, yet a lot less aroma on tap. Slightly better apperance.
Ludwig (60) - USA - APR 10, 2003
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
This has to be one of the worst beers that I have ever tried. It has a taste of chewed tobacco to me.
damirvrkic (56) - Franklin ACT, AUSTRALIA - APR 10, 2003
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Lovely beer, nice bitterness and good body. This is what a English beer should taste like, not like the other mass produced imports we get in Australia.
Panzuriel (1410) - Westerville, Ohio, USA - APR 6, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Nice toffee amber colored liquid with a nice head. Good malty aroma with a hint of nuttiness. Great combo of flavors overall. Good texture and nice finish.
Spiesy (2338) - Sydney, Greater London, AUSTRALIA - APR 5, 2003
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
The right temperature makes all the difference to this beer. If you have to drink it from a bottle or can, make sure it not too cold. Its has lovely nutty flavours, strong colour and appearance. The palate is well balanced, with sweet and toasted flavours disguising the 5.2 ABV. Warning despite how well the first goes down, this is not a session beer.
Ernest (6662) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - MAR 30, 2003
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Draught can. Head is initially average sized, creamy, off-white, fully lasting. Body is medium amber. Aroma is lightly malty (cookie), with a note of diacetyl. Flavor is lightly sweet, lightly acidic. Finish is lightly acidic, lightly bitter. Light body, watery (almost creamy) texture, soft carbonation. More nitro-ruined colored water.