Jfishback13 (275) - Royal Oak, Michigan, USA - DEC 26, 2002
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: APR 5, 2004 For the style, if it's not Guinness, it's just not quite right. This is pretty tasty though, just not good enough.
awaller05 (305) - Sharon, Wisconsin, USA - DEC 21, 2002
2.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
When I poured this beer into my favorite beer mug I was delighted to see the thick creamy head, and the dark chocalatly color. Thats where it all stopped being delightful as I found my first sip to be extremly horrid. I guess this stout isn’t up my ally.
ogivlado (6301) - Zagreb, CROATIA - DEC 21, 2002
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Bottled(500ml). -Good beer, but red is better!
HarmonKill-a-Brew (407) - Wilmar, Arkansas, USA - DEC 21, 2002
4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: OCT 10, 2009 I thought this tasted a good bit like canned Guinness. Another fine stout.
CherokeeJarod (54) - , USA - DEC 20, 2002
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
This beer pours into the glass a brown/black color. The head is a beige/tan color, semi thick and lasting. The aroma is of coffee, malt, and hints of chocolate. The taste is of coffee, chocolate, and a sweet malt. Kind of reminded me of that other Irish Stout, Guinness. Not a bad drink.
UnionMade (621) - Connecticut, USA - DEC 19, 2002
3.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
So similar to Guinness I doubt i could tell the difference in a blind test. The settling of the beer is the best part, and nitro’d stouts like this always get a 4-5 just based on that.
BillKismet (3474) - Seattle, Washington, USA - DEC 15, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
I love the way beers of this style evolve their appearance. Turbulent, uvulating black bottom--churns into a brown middle and an appealing cream head--to form a 3 layerd beer. It has been awhile since i have had a dry stout--however; this seemed far different than what I have had before. This beer was redolent of a smoked filled room and the taste reflected this initial observation. While it was smooth and dry in flavor--it had such a smokey, burnt quality as to open the possibility that this was from and overheated batch of malt?? Drinkable and more pleasant as the experience endured, but I just can’t rate it highly at this point. I should probably rerate this and Guinness in the near future.
psychodrama311 (122) - petaluma, Nevada, USA - DEC 15, 2002
4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
nice version of the tap beer. i would have to say the closest i’ve seen. good beer.
ProstmanSux (102) - Lake Ariel, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 11, 2002
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Hey its a good beer, but if Guinness isn’t on tap i’ll take Murphy’s..
mikejmadden99 (103) - Mountain Top, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 10, 2002
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Sort of tastes like Guiness, deep dark brown in color, almsot black with a tan/brown head. Smells of sweet malts and coffee. Tasting of coffee, toffee, chocolates, backed with the sweet tasting malt preseent in this brew.