puboflyons (2416) - Allenstown, New Hampshire, USA - JUL 16, 2007
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
16 fl. oz (US) can. Pours yellow. Foamy head with a lot of carbonation. Aroma of straw and metal. Watery. Not a lot of body to it. It was not as atrocious as I was led to believe. Better than some of its counterparts (i.e., Schlitz & Schaefer).
bigrond (1499) - factoryville, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 20, 2007
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
this beer was horrible. no flavor, no charatcer....nothing.
This beer is a bottom of the barrel brew. I had on vacation and was sicken by it.
wingman333 (333) - San Antonio, Texas, USA - MAY 19, 2007
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
I was in the Cape Cod area and was excited to see this one in the beer cooler. It was well-carbonated but quite weak. I was disappointed as I had always heard this was the legendary beer to drink when in New England.
JAF737300 (1291) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAR 21, 2007
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Hey for cheaper old school laeger this is not ad at all! I am quote impressed and I hipe they continue to do well.....it is nice to see some of these hang in and taste good!
DaveB (73) - Holyoke, Massachusetts, USA - MAR 3, 2007
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
On tap at the Seaport Hotel in Boston.
I had not had a "Gansett" since the Budweiser beer strike in 1974. Narragansett was the only beer available at most of the bars on Cape Cod that summer.
The new Gansett wasn’t bad. I would drink it again if I see it on tap.
Hippystomper (35) - Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA - FEB 24, 2007
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Since I live in Narragansett it’s hard to avoid drinking this at least monthly. It really doesn’t differ much from other cheap american lagers but it isn’t terrible. The flavor is maybe a bit more complex than Bud/PBR etc. Oh, and it’s pretty cheap and comes in sweet red 16oz cans. Woo! Gansett!
LyndaNova (532) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - DEC 25, 2006
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Cold 12oz bottle: Pours a clear straw color with a small foamy alabaster head. Aroma is of sweet malt and hay. Taste is of sweet malt and nice yeast. Crisp, light bodied and well carbonated. Ending is watery and faint.
kevd193213 (903) - Hope Valley, Rhode Island, USA - DEC 21, 2006
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Glad to see this back in Rhode Island, though sadly its not made here anymore and is made in NY by a contract brewery. Dirty golden pour. Large bubbles, fizzy bright white head. Taste is bitter, with a particularly strong finish for this style, with some hops. Good to almost great for a pale lager, and has more bite that most.
mansquito (3980) - Nueva York, New York, USA - OCT 31, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This was surprisingly smooth for a relatively cheap and hoppy taste. Very smooth and grainy. Defiantely worth drinking. (not metallic from bottles as previous reviewer noted) It is about as cheap as the macro brews and a superior beer in virtually every single way. Definately a good blind buy.
RCL (2030) - Waltham, Massachusetts, USA - SEP 28, 2006
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not a fine beer, but a cheap beer. Slightly metallic (from can, I know, but I couldn’t find it in bottles) and grainy taste. Fairly reminiscent of PBR, perhaps with a bit more flavor. Pretty good pale lager. I’ve had much worse.