1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 daboskabouter (1470) - Fergus, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 13, 2003
Very pale yellow. Slightly fruity and some light roasted hops, digging here. The body is lightly fruity, spritzy and bland as hell. Pretty gross stuff here.
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20 joeycapps (1467) - Waterdown, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 6, 2003
Very pale straw yellow. Aroma of DMS, skunk, & wet cardboard. Fizzy body. Bland, thin, watery light corn flavour.
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 heavy (1466) - Split, CROATIA - SEP 11, 2008
0.375 l (12 fl. oz) can, brought by our guests. So it became my first US beer...on 9/11. Cute. It poured pale yellow body with medium white head. Very weak industrial malty and some sourish aroma. Slightly unpleasant but very unimpressive. Flavor is strange indeed, I felt really nothing at first glance, but later it came to some not so nice floral sweetness and some strange, even interesting sourness. Really very light bodied. No finish except some bad aftertaste that ruins the beer even more. So...natural - nooo way (no hops and some artificial malt), light - yes, sure. I realized now when entering my rate this is one of the most hated US lagers, well, I’ve surely had even worse, this is just too watery and not so unpleasant.
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 Slipstream (1465) - USA - APR 29, 2008
It is interesting to see what others have to say about this stuff. One guy calls it a "lake beer" - I like the phrase, but in this case I wonder if it means that the beer tastes like putrid lake water. It is also interesting to see how many people remember it as their college’s beer of choice. Anyway, I had a double size can with a corporate label. Its best point was the good-sized, foamy head. There was a nasty aroma of yeast, turpentine, and rotting vegetation. The character was weak and watery, and the taste was tinny and mildly bitter. NL calls itself a pilsner, but I am not sure why. And why does Anheuser Busch make this stuff, when they make the superior Bud Light? But the real question is, why would anybody drink it? I guess the low cost would be the only reason, because it is only a little bit better than skunk piss.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 dnstone (1458) - Mons, BELGIUM - JUL 26, 2011
Who can forget the old frat reliable shit beer. Just don’t spill this one on anyones new popped polo, or confuse it for the roofiiecolada they just slipped to the girl next to you.
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 nqualls (1452) - Nashville, Tennessee, USA - JAN 26, 2009
This beer has as close to an appearance of water as you can get. The flavor is almost non-existent. What a crap beer.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 Zinister (1417) - Houston, Texas, USA - MAY 6, 2006
Sort of sad to admit I even drank this. It was at a Louisiana crawfish boil....so that made it taste a bit better.
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 igneous1 (1415) - Davenport, Iowa, USA - NOV 30, 2001
good value for the price and by that i mean, when you finally get trashed from this stuff, it seems like a good value...i also appreciate a run-on sentence
|