RateBeer
Home >

Nectar Ales Pale Nectar

 (RETIRED)
overall
92
96
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 90   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.48   EST. CALORIES: 147   ABV: 4.9%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Has a golden amber color and a light refreshing body. (Editor’s Note: originally brewed by Humboldt Brewing Company under the name "Humboldt Pale Nectar Ale" until the acquisition by Firestone Walker.)


3.6
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
urbnhautebourg (997) - Annapolis, Maryland, USA - NOV 15, 2002
As this was preceded by an infected beer, my impression of this might be colored. Very light but beautifully fruity and well hopped given its lightness. Works really well inside its slim frame. Superb for summer drinking, but perhaps even then I’d go for their Red Nectar. Rather classy overall.

3.6
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 16/20
herbjones (742) - Orange, California, USA - OCT 25, 2002
Light honey colored pour. Thick white head. Malty, floral nose. Nice balance with it leaning toward the malt near the front. Slight hop bitterness near the end.

4.1
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
uglybastard (101) - Riverside, California, USA - AUG 27, 2002
Extremly large head that piles up to resmeble whipped cream. Took me about five minutes to get all twelve ounces in the glass. Hazy orangish, slightly reddish body. Bit of honey and cinnamon in the nose as well as some flowery hop smell. Wow, this is different, for a pale. I suppose (and thus added it under the style) Humboldt was going for an english pale ale style. It actually tastes a lot like a german hef. Has banana and clove flavors to it. Sweet and smooth, almost a creamy texture in the mouth. I guess if I rated this against true english style pale ales it would score low. However, I rated it for what it was: a realy nice beer. (Got a lower score for the apperance only because the head was SO big initially.)

3.9
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - AUG 10, 2002
Pours a lightly hazy deep amber, the head is beige, creamy and long lasting, the sheets in huge sheets to cover the glass. Nose is ’Hop Floral’, malt tones, sweet, and quite pleasant. Front is lightly sweet, top is light, the finish is quite acidic, nicely hopped and a real ’Session’ beer if I have ever tasted one. Ranks #336 on my current 1000 beer list. Thanks once again Herbjones

4.4
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 16/20
Schroppfy (2360) - Łódż, Warsaw, Poland; Michigan, Ohio, USA - JUN 7, 2002
Original, 1/02/02: Exceptional in every way. PhillyBeer2112 mentions the somewhat buttery flavor and mouthfeel, and man is he right. The hops are perfect, in aroma and in taste, for the style. Head retention perfect, color, body -- everything. Bitter finish, but not too bitter. I am deeply saddened to state, clearly and for the record, that Bell’s Pale and Great Lakes Burning River are a slight step behind. Rerate on 2/15/02: Some slight consistency problems have had me drop it a bit, now the equal in my master APA list to the 2 above and Smuttynose Shoals. Super beer!

3.9
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
heykevin (1274) - Decorah, Iowa, USA - APR 6, 2002
A high quality APA. Extremely attractive floral hops, just enough sweetness to balance nicely. The trouble that APAs have being distinct is that if they push any of the ingredients too much they get out of the style department, so to make a name for itself, an APA needs to make it with balance, and this beer is spot on in that department. First rate APA.

3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
argo0 (11349) - Washington DC, USA - FEB 9, 2002
UPDATED: APR 14, 2004 Clear amber body topped by small off-white head. Aroma is medium sweet, pine/grapefruit. Taste is mild sweet, pine of medium bitterness. Dry, medium body.

3.6
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
gwfrankpsu (231) - McKinleyville, California, USA - DEC 18, 2001
Nice aroma, medium hop character, a really nice drinking beer.

4.4
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 17/20
joet (2137) - Santa Rosa, California, USA - JUL 16, 2001
Bottle. Medium golden and excellent foam retention. There’s a great bit of floral perfume in the mildly hoppy nose. Amazingly tasty and well-balanced light medium body with good hopping and not much sweetness. Gains bitterness as it warms. Humboldt ROCKS.

3.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
PhillyBeer2112 (2517) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - JUN 29, 2001
This might have tasted hoppier, but I preceded it with a HopDevil! Still it had a nice hop flavor and aroma - a bit floral. The real story here, though, is its Englishy fruitiness and slight butteriness and buttery mouthfeel. Smooth, slightly sweet, and very drinkable. A nice beer. Golden yellow with a good head.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  9 


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50