thedm (4850) - Fort Wayne, USA - DEC 31, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
This bottled brew from a bottle shop poured a large sized head of foamy finely sized white colored bubbles that were long lasting and left behind a typically carbonated slightly hazy light yellow colored body and a thick foamy lacing. The aroma was malt hop and grassy. The mouth feel was tingly at the start and at the finish. The flavor contained notes of hops and malt. Not one that I would likely drink again.
Psytron (1062) - Turku, FINLAND - AUG 11, 2012
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Mild smell of malts. Pale golden colour. Lightly malty aroma. Really boring lager.
kalervo (539) - FINLAND - SEP 22, 2011
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Basic tasteless pale lager. Nothing disturbing, very boring. Just nothing.
Kavu (1813) - Helsinki, FINLAND - AUG 15, 2011
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
It’s hard to think of something to say of these stock lagers. Clear golden, malts in the aroma, malts in the flavor. Drinkable and forgettable.
pivopija (13) - BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - JUL 17, 2003
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Normal bottled Nektar is much better than this canned export one. Still has a special Nektar taste but not as good as bottled Nektar.
ogivlado (5287) - Zagreb, CROATIA - JAN 10, 2003
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Canned(330ml). -not so good beer like Nektar because there is very strong metallic taste because of can