JenDaveMartin (2) - San Francisco, California, USA - SEP 20, 2004 does not count
3.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
Everyone goes crazy over this beer. It’s hit San Francisco like a tidal wave, replacing Sam Adams in some bars.
Sendog04 (1) - Downey, California, USA - SEP 12, 2004 does not count
4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Bottle: I had this first in Yosemite, great combination. Great color with nice head. A superb balance of malt and hops with a sweetness that was not overpowering. The sweetness and the toasty flavor made this one a keeper.
Ubiquibeer (140) - Cleveland, USA - SEP 10, 2004
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
An amber pour with a decent head. Amber ales are not my favorite style, but this one had a nice toasty male flavor and a decent hop presence, like the description states. A little thin to me though. All in all a drinkable ale, but I agree with a previous poster that the beer is a little over hyped.
clong83 (285) - San Diego, California, USA - SEP 6, 2004
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Perhaps I am biased because I lived in a cabin for three months with no beer and then drank one of these, and thought it was heavenly. Good smoky, almost burnt malty flavor.
biz82 (1327) - austin, Texas, USA - SEP 2, 2004
3.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Appealing earthy, toasty and slightly fruity aroma unlike any other beer. Slightly hazy amber appearance with a thin white head. Muted noble hop aroma and flavor. The flavor matches the aroma with nice carbonation giving it a spritzy quality. Finishes clean and slightly sweet. I suspect much of the flavor comes from Breiss Victory malt. A quality, if over hyped, ale.
slimweebs (162) - Los Angeles, California, USA - AUG 31, 2004
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Another decent ale that’s on tap almost everywhere in Oregon. A nice light amber beer that won’t offend the palate. I know this beer is very popular because it is so drinkable. Most everyone can appreciate the nice balance and flavor of the malts and hops. Neither one overpowers here.. which is a disappointment for some. Call it unexciting and uninspiring, but this beer serves its purpose.
Tejas (988) - Dallas, Texas, USA - AUG 30, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
Nice clear light amber color. I had high hopes for this one. Sadly, I was not impressed. Entirely too thin. Flavor dissipates rather quickly. I kept having to take another sip in order to keep the flavor around. Decent beer but nothing more. Definitely not a great beer like the Fat Tire cult claims.
richbeir (15) - Austin, Texas, USA - AUG 29, 2004
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Light semi-sweet malty flavor, nice amber color with a balanced hoppy flavor. A good basic amber ale that’s acessible.
MayorQuimby (100) - Santa Barbara, California, USA - AUG 29, 2004
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Tap. Amber color, white head. Not much to the aroma. Smoky malt flavor, not very hoppy yet still bitter, which didn’t really do it for me. I’ve had much better amber ales.
Jeppe (2631) - Brooklyn, Alabama, USA - AUG 29, 2004
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Sturdy creamy head on a clear light amber body. Weak sweet malty aroma with toffee notes. Malty and slightly hoppy flavor with a thin finish. Ordinary beer, but it is a massproduction after all.....