Miggl (32) - Mesa, Arizona, USA - AUG 12, 2002
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
Not my type of beer. Very bitter end, not much body. Especially bad when warm.
Ernest (5882) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - AUG 11, 2002
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: MAY 14, 2003 2003 bottle. Head is initially small, fizzy, white, mostly diminishing. Body is clear dark yellow. Aroma is lightly yeasty (dough), lightly hoppy (citrus - grapefruit), lightly malty (toasted grain), hint of lime. Flavor is lightly sweet, moderately acidic, lightly bitter. Finish is moderately bitter, moderately acidic, slightly husky. Light to medium body, watery texture, fizzy carbonation, metallic, lightly astringent. Second (and definitely last) rating with this year's edition, and I'm just as disappointed. Unbalanced flavor profile (very little malt, but lots of citric tartness and bitterness), boring and light aroma, raw doughy yeast is too strong, and it's grainy, metallic, light and fizzy. Embarrassingly bad...almost macro bad. I thought Frambozen was nasty enough, but this takes the cake. It's not even a good lawnmower beer. Ok, I'll shut up now.
legion242 (2071) - Richardson, Texas, USA - AUG 7, 2002
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Pretty, clear copper color; Head is dense and has stamina- lots of lace left on the glass; Nose is spicy, unusual. Very dry earthy profile. Kudos for using some hops not normally found in a lot of American beers- but I wouldn’t know a Kafir leaf if it slapped me upside the head. Crisp as hell.
herbjones (742) - Orange, California, USA - AUG 2, 2002
3.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Nice aroma. Pours beautifully. This a very nice Introduction beer. Gave one to my neighbor and she gave it a big thumbs up.
Aubrey (3356) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - AUG 2, 2002
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: MAR 28, 2006 LOFT: Very refreshing and clean-tasting. Wonderful hop aroma; kaffir addition is interesting and really adds to the beer. Flowery and a little perfumey. Nice mouthfeel. SKINNY DIP: IMO, this beer has changed quite a bit from Loft to Skinny Dip. Seems a little thinner. A bit more toast. Much less of a hop profile and kaffir addition has been weakened. It also seems to drift more toward Fat Tire. My rating reflects Skinny Dip, not Loft.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - JUL 27, 2002
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: MAY 17, 2006 The beer emigrates from the 12-ounce brown bottle a luminous gold, the head large and frothy, the color a brilliant white, as it fades away, and the residual lace forms a thin coating upon the glass. Nose is fresh and crisp, sweet with malt, very light musty aroma, and a tiny touch of hops, Start is benign in its sweetness, the grain profile standard and the top light to moderate in feel. Finish is prickly in its acidity, the hops modest in their spiciness, desert bone dry aftertaste, a decent refreshing beer.
Indra (2530) - Overland Park, Kansas, USA - JUL 5, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: MAR 21, 2006 Mostly hoppy aroma, some lighter malt as well. Smells and looks similar to a California Common style. Clear light to medium amber-orange color, fairly average carbonation and head, not a whole lot there (sampled on draught). Largely hop-accented flavor, surprisingly evident and bitter hop flavors, in fact. Some light maltiness, but in the background. Not fruity like Cascade or other stereotypical American hops, these almost taste more British, or European at least. I’d be curious to see the IBUs and type of hops for this one. Again hoppy, herbal, citric and bitter for the finish, fairly clean, definitely dry. Overall, not complex by any means, but makes a decent enough quencher.