GaltScat (195) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - JAN 26, 2007
2.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A lot of good reviews with high ratings; but I must be missing something. Perhaps the name is misleading. This is not a stout; there is nothing about it that resembles a stout. The aroma and flavor are overwhelming with black cherries. Unplugged Cherry Stout tastes like malted black cherries made in Artesian spring water. If you like sweet, fruity beers, then you will like this.
incutrav (577) - Woodbury, Minnesota, USA - FEB 12, 2007
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I will say strait out, that i am NOT a fan of fruit in my brew. That being said, this was not for me. Smells like cherries, tastes like cheeries mixed into a nice stout. I only had a couple sips of this and passed it on to some "fruitier" friends that were around. Wasnt overly sweet though, which was surprising. I love New Glarus, and they put out tasty brews, but my preference is not for there fruit beers.
drpimento (2098) - La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA - APR 14, 2010
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Whoa! Another beer where I was expecting something quite different. Poured a decent tan head and some lace. Head fades to a thin cover within a minute or so. Color is a very dark mahoganey with red highlights. Arome is BAM cherry pie! Along with some malt. Have very little idea where the "stout" part comes in. Flavor’s about the same as aroma, with a little more of the sour cherry coming thru along with a smidgen of malt. No roasty, toasty, stout qualities that I can find. It is dark. Body is ok and so is carbonation. Finish is like flavor. Should be good to cook with. Kind of a girly beer.
propsync (10) - Wisconsin, USA - FEB 27, 2012
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I expected a stout with a little sting of cherry in it. Something dark, mysterious, and big. This was thin and overpowered by the cherries. It’s drinkable, but seems more of a sour brown ale than anything else. A rare miss by Dan.
BrockLanders (770) - Panama City, Florida, USA - JUL 25, 2006
2.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Nice translucent reddish-brown pour...minimal head that never develops. Cherry tart nose...some coffee-maltiness too. Flavor leans toward a sour cherry flavor, light malt mix, maybe some mocha notes. Thin mouthfeel....the sourness is more evident as I consume this. Not horrible, but certainly disappointing.
YourDarkLord (1800) - Urbana, Illinois, USA - APR 26, 2006
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A great disappointment. I’m a big fan of chocolate covered cherries. No, not the overly sweet ones with thick sugar goo inside but the more upscale ones. The idea of a nice, rich stout that combines chocolate and cherry flavor is enticing. This wasn’t. A deep chestnut liquid poured out, topped by a small tan head. The nose contained elements of cherries (dark and tart), chocolate, oak, and vanilla. Yet is wasn’t seductive. Just there. Too light in the body for a stout and too much carbonation. The flavor was a big disappointment. Some cherry notes and lots of alcohol. All in all, a less than satisfying drink.
tjthresh (1865) - Greenfield, Indiana, USA - AUG 30, 2006
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: DEC 15, 2006 Really pretty PALE for a stout. Mahogany with a foamy darker tan head. The aroma is very chocolate covered cherries. Most of the stout character is completly covered. I notice in the desctiption that it oak aged. That explains a bit. The cherry flavor seems artificial to me. Lots of tannins. I wil conceed that this beer is interesting and different, but its not much of a stout. I don’t really enjoy it much. I’d like to thank !FastSTI for the chance to try it.
Dough77 (821) - Aurora, Illinois, USA - OCT 4, 2007
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Murky brownish dark red color on the pour with minmal head. Nose is heavy on the cherry with some chocolate malt tones as well. Flavor is similar but the cherry carries a slight sourness that doesnt blend exactly how I would have expected it to with the stout portion of the beer. Cherry and chocolate =good. tart cherry and chocolate= not so good. Not that the beers horrible, just a little off.
ClarkVV (3856) - Allston, Massachusetts, USA - JUN 20, 2006
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
2006 bottle from StewardofGondor (I may never drink all of the beers he so graciously sent) shared on 6/14/06. A rapidly fizzling head (dark ivory/buttercream in color) almost immediately fizzles to a ring, leaving no real lacing, but a slight film behind. The body is extremely dark, but ruby tinted on the edges and showing a medium-high to high clarity upon settling, unfortunately filtered and force carbonated, it seems. Extremely forceful sweet cherries crowd in on the nose, giving way briefly, for some light tartness and hints of old, oily, dry oak notes. Chocolate dots at the palate, with the requisite burnt, ashy black malts, but the cherries outlive, becoming sweet, nearly cloying in the nose and almost gummy/thick. But it certainly is something to be smelled, being of medium-high strength and just bursting with sweet cherries. Not unlike cherry pie, with a very light tartness in the backround. In the flavor, the cherry overwhelms and what should be a dominant, dark, ashy, roasted malt is left wondering how it lost the battle to cherries. Just like a day or two old cherry pie, it has that gummy, moist filling-like flavor, sweet and yet with some tartness. Had I never tried Jolly Pumpkin, I’d be more apt to find this interesting, but it just seems crude and forced, the barrel character being tart, but not cohesive with the syrupy, sweet, strong cherries and disjointed black malt character. The high level of filtration certainly does not help things, as the beer goes flat and watery quickly, with a loose texture and lacking carbonation. Tight, natural carbonation coud keep the sweet cherries at bay, while allowing more of the barrel character to develop. It certainly does show aspects of wild yeast or, at least, heavy tannins and sharp wood, but it just isnt elegantly done, too brutish here, IMHO. Alcohol is well-masked.
AllAboutStout (605) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - APR 11, 2008
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours a very dark brown in color with some ruby highlights. Smell is tart cherries and some chocolate.
Smell is the same as the smell, but not impressive. Not my favorite New Glarus offering.