Brewed by John Smiths (Heineken UK)
Style: Brown Ale
Tadcaster, England


on tap

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 3750   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.95/5   EST. CALORIES: 141   ABV: 4.7%
Available filtered and pasteurised in keg and bottle.
Newcastle Brown Ale was first brewed in 1927 in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, by Jim Porter after three years of development. Production moved from Newcastle to Gateshead at the end of 2004 and to Tadcaster on closure of the Dunston brewery in 2010.

   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Winchester (75) - Struggle Town NSW, AUSTRALIA - AUG 31, 2003
UPDATED: OCT 10, 2003 I simply didn't like it that much. The aroma was inviting, but the taste was terrible.

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
JonR888710 (999) - Cochabamba, BOLIVIA - AUG 30, 2003
Thin, brown body with hints of amber. Head is little to none at all. Smell is actually pretty good, with healthy malt and nutty scents. Taste is malt, roasted, bitter hops, water and a very small amount of nuttiness, in that order for the most part. Aftertaste is short-lived, with some bitterness from the hops and more wateriness. Probably one of the better beers you can get at a bar sporting all domestic taps. Had on tap at Dave’s Taverna in Harrisonburg, VA.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
kindestcut (30) - Addison, Texas, USA - AUG 29, 2003
If I have a standby beer, and I'm not really sure that I do, Newcastle comes the closest. Go to the grocery store and you can bet Newcastle will be there. And that's a good thing. I like the look of a Newcastle. It pours a dark brown, a very dark brown, as befits a brown ale. There is not much of a head so drinking can begin immediately, or at least no drinking through bubbles. Newcastle has a nice aroma. Not sweet but you can smell the malt. As much as I like Newcastle, I will admit that it can be skinky. Actually, I have never tasted a beer whose flavor varies from 6-pack to 6-pack as much as Newcastle. I don't know if it's the clear bottles or it may be old beer but it irritates me. However, I have had much more good than bad. Newcastle proves that dark color does not necessarily equal strong flavor. However, the flavor is good and even better after the first!

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
weusebio (69) - Portland, Oregon, USA - AUG 28, 2003
Nothing shocking here. Just an easy to drink brown ale (yes, brown). It's one advantage is it's crisper than some beers you'll find in british style pubs (boddingtons or guinness) and it makes a good contrast to either of those.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Boystout (1000) - Chisinau, MOLDOVA - AUG 28, 2003
Standard brown ale (color was truly brown) with almost no head. Pleasant sweet aroma, not very complex though... Not much to write about palate: malts with light caramel. High carbonation. Good session beer but not 3D.

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
ante (3374) - Stockholm, SWEDEN - AUG 27, 2003
(sigh...) Brown color with a very small head. Sweet aroma of burnt sugar. Fruity flavour wiyh some cherry notes and burnt sugar. Flat and metallic mouthfeel. Sweet and sticky fruity finish.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
happy4hops (376) - Bel Air, Maryland, USA - AUG 26, 2003
UPDATED: AUG 27, 2003 It's very true...Get the "fresher" bottles in the 12-pks(enclosed)These just came in tonight and smell like a nice slightly nutty good beer/crossed w/ a "normal beer".Pours out an amazing red/amber/weak head/lace.Tastes nice when fresh.Malty & a bit hoppy? in it's own respect.Quick dry finish.I like it alot though I get it for 10.50 a 12-pk(mcewan's IPA is a touch better)but this is a slugger!By the way,pour this one out of it's stanky bottle!Sweet & a tease of roasted...

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
drismyhero (815) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - AUG 25, 2003
I wish they'd just bite the damn bullet and put this in a brown bottle (same with Sammy Smith's) because I can't help but think every damn bottle I've had has been exposed to far too much light. I respect the absolutely amazing cultural appeal of this beer, and the traditional methods with which it is brewed, but I just don't think it's that great. Startling levels of tinniness exist in the malt which invade every aspect of the beer other than the appearance (which is very classic brown). It smells like a tin can that at one time contained caramel syrup, it tastes like you are licking a piece of metal (lightly coated with caramel), and the mouthfeel is *gasp* tinny. This may be a cultural icon, but so is Bud.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
DavidP (1748) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - AUG 22, 2003
UPDATED: DEC 7, 2003 Watery, with an oily nut taste. I've had it both on tap and from the bottle, and it was about the same in both places.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
FtWorthBrew (105) - Fort Worth, Texas, USA - AUG 21, 2003
Maybe It would be beter on tap but from the botttle its pretty plain. Definantly did not live up to the hype

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page  1 « 308 309 310  311  312 313 314 » 375

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
about us
About RateBeer
New Beers
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50