RateBeer
Score
4484
OVERALLStyle

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 862   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.99   EST. CALORIES: 132   ABV: 4.4%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Named for the delicate engravings popularized by 19th century seafarers, Scrimshaw is a fresh tasting Pilsner brewed in the finest European tradition from Munich and Klages malts, Hallertauer and Tettnang hops. Scrimshaw has a subtle hop character, a crisp, clean palate, and a dry finish.


most recent ratings

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
beerbumble (42) - Reno, Nevada, USA - FEB 20, 2003
Not much aroma. Nice color. Good original taste. Not a bad beer. Good amount of carbonation.

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
redlem (1264) - Ohio, USA - FEB 15, 2003
Slightly hazy golden color with a thin white head that quickly disappeared, odd for a pils. Upon closer inspection the haze is from sedimentation. Nice carbonation. Not much aroma, maybe an old cardboard box. Not much taste either, a slight cookie dough. I could taste and smell more hops in their stout, which is an odd choice. A below average pils.

2.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
JMerritt (1676) - Macomb, Illinois, USA - FEB 9, 2003
I picked this up because the name reminded me of my childhood trip out east to Boston and Nantucket Island, where scrimshaw is found everywhere, from museums to my relatives' homes.

Anyhoo, the beer poured a hazy golden color with a grand white head, lacing included. Aroma is flowery, but very bland. Finally, a pilsener that doesn't smell like a skunk! Very light bodied, buttery, and lightly malted. Low bitterness at the backend, and finish is watery and nearly non-existant. A rather inoffensive beer, especially for a pilsener, but it sadly doesn't live up to the memories from my vacation.

3.4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
mpbro (132) - Stanford, California, USA - JAN 20, 2003
(17Jan2003-12oz.bottle) Nice effort, mostly well-executed. Aroma: fruity (citrus), mild hops. Head: thin, quickly receding, non-lacing, flat. Color: reddish gold. Flavor: Hops, peachy, tangy, but not sour, light yeast. Mouthfeel: surprisingly creamy, though flat. Summary: complex, subtle flavors, handicapped somewhat by an utter lack of carbonation. Over-carbonation does certainly mask complex flavors, but this is too flat.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Aubrey (3343) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - DEC 22, 2002
Yeasty, somewhat vinous and fruity nose. Soft and creamy mouthfeel. Fruity malt flavors with a slight bitterness. Somewhat cloying and not very crisp. Strange and curious; not very stylistically adherent.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
foduck (328) - Denton, Texas, USA - DEC 17, 2002
Rather unsatisfying. Too light, nothing really there. Some sweet graininess, tiny bit of hops and that’s it.

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
psychodrama311 (122) - petaluma, Nevada, USA - DEC 15, 2002
defintely a disappointing beer considering the home of it. but not horrible by no means.

1.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Nuffield (3348) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - DEC 8, 2002
I find it hard to believe when breweries can simultaneously produce things with a reputation like Old Rasputin and drivel like this. It’s either market forces or something inherent in the style. Dense, regular lacing, almost completely diminishing. Bubbles in body were not clear streams but a chaos; curious. Strong yellow color. Sweet at the front, then replaced by a pair of curious flavors--floral and metallic. Palate was very disappointing--limp, thin, disgusting. I ended up pouring some of this out--it’s not worth the calories.

3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
stephen (308) - California, USA - DEC 6, 2002
A pretty lively Pilsner. Good hop bitterness and flavor. Fairly clean, but sweeter than I was expecting in the finish. I’ll stick with Old Ras.

3.7
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
urbnhautebourg (997) - Annapolis, Maryland, USA - DEC 2, 2002
This is good American Pilsner. The progenitor of American Micro Pilsner family, of which St. George is a direct descendent and Victory and Tupper being hoppier cousins. Lovely hop nose with good malt and hop flavor. Easy drinking. While this is a fine beer, I can’t help prefer its progeny. Have had some rather awful samples in the past.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »




View Page
1 « 80 81 82 83 84 85 86


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


tags




Copyright © 2000-2013,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50