JorisPPattyn (8221) - Ursel, BELGIUM - DEC 25, 2004
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Very pale gold, totally clear; fluffy white head, as whipped eggwhite. Nose: chaff, chalk,... Precious little nose. Ever so slightly sourish taste, surrounding grain/pale malts. Finish is a bit toasted and grassy-hay. Watery texture, light bodied, empty, gassy MF. If this is Premium, compared to the Lager, I dread the day they bring out a Luxus...
pintbypint (2781) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - DEC 23, 2004
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
500ml green bottle. Not too much different than their Lager. Poured a shade darker, cloudy gold. A bit less grass/skunk aroma, more sweet malts, a bit fruitier, otherwise it’s the same.
Emil (6065) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - DEC 8, 2004
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Can. Golden color no head and a metallic corny aroma , light dry grassy taste, light body and a dry thin finish.
YourDarkLord (1800) - Urbana, Illinois, USA - NOV 29, 2004
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Orange/amber with white head. Nose was faintly sweet with slight yeast and hops. Grassy. Weak and watery. Flavor was unremarkable. Just not good beer.
Cornfield (5570) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - OCT 4, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
I’m annoyed that I had to buy a 4-pack to try this and have some lager variety in the ’fridge. It looked fine, pale golden with a vanishing thin white head, but had a bitter malt aroma with a hint of grassiness. Kind of watery with a touch of sweetness. Had a stale finish.
heemer77 (5152) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - OCT 3, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: JAN 24, 2005 Sampled at a bar in Kyiv. Ths is exactly what you would expect. Just a light amber coloring with a corn flake aroma and some slight hops. The taste is pleasant enough with bread and some weird grassiness.
Trappist (286) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - SEP 20, 2004
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
What the hell was this?
It was probably on of the skunkiest beers that I have ever had the displeasure of drinking. And I only got half way through before I through it away. Bad aroma, taste and the overall impression is two thumbs down!
crazyvin (2026) - New York, USA - AUG 30, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
poured a light amber color with a very crisp look too it. Had a frothy head too it but if fadded fast perhaps i shook the bottle. Taste was initally sweet with some hops flavoring. beer was very mild but still enjoyable. Better then some other pale lagers.
sayravai (4677) - Helsinki, FINLAND - AUG 1, 2004
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
(Canned) Pale golden color with almost no head. Slightly sweet-honeyish aroma. Slightly sour flavor with little malt and no hops to speak of until the short, bitter finish. Light to medium-bodied, medium-carbonated, quite watery palate. A below average pale lager - especially by the looks of it. Sure, it will be drinkable after a few cans...
jfm (1724) - Holbæk, DENMARK - JUL 5, 2004
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Golden color with little or no head. The taste is watery, light grassy and boring.