nick76 (2656), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Oct 27, 2005 Updated: May 27, 2008This is about as good as it gets for NA. It’s hard to tell that it’s not just a really good lager. Maybe even better than some AB lagers. The aroma is a little corn like but mostly toasted malt. The appearance is better than most. It is amber (of course) with a better than average NA beer head. The flavor is good. It is sweet caramel with toasted malt and a tiny bit of bitterness. Palate is much better than most NA’s. Finish is sweet. This is a good but cheap beer. beerbill (1944), Laurel, New York, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Sep 11, 2005 12 oz. bottle. I much prefer the amber version to the regular product. Pours a clear amber color with a white head. Light aroma from caramel. Caramel also comes through in the flavor. In the NA group, this is one of my favorites. JoeMcPhee (5000), Jackson Heights, New York, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Aug 19, 2005 Picked this up on the way of the grocery store just to see how is was. Clear, deep amber colour with a thi white head. Malty aroma, light sweet caramel aroma. Flavour is semi-sweet, caramel, a bit waxy, with light bitterness. This won’t win any awards, but I’ve had much worse. It doesn’t have that cloying raw wort flavour that many N/A beers have. Styles (1653), Lincoln Park, Michigan, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Aug 5, 2005 Dirty amber/brown color. Aroma is faint roasted grain/malt. No flavor whatsoever. Another style down. cazort (413), Newark, Delaware, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jul 21, 2005 Updated: Mar 19, 2007(bottle) This one greatly disappointed me; I was hoping it would be better than the regular O’Doul’s but it was worse. Pleasant aroma; taste is weak, sour malt flavour with hint of hops. Has the bad qualities (chemical taste) of many macro brews. Heavy, and quite filling; actually, the heaviest NA beer I’ve had yet, but the taste is so weak that this isn’t a good thing. If you want a cheap NA, there are many better choices. In my opinion, even the regular O’Doul’s is a better beer. Nekronos (2263), Xalapa, Mexico
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 11/20 | Jul 14, 2005 Updated: Feb 2, 2006The colour is Amber, efectivelly,but it is still a non alcoholic beer, so I rate it like a normla beer, maybe is not fair. Radek Kliber (3942), Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), Ontario, Canada
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Jul 11, 2005 Amber gold with fizzy head . Grassy raw grainy aroma . Highly carbonated , sweet that is increasingly more shown while you drink . Light fruity malt feel can’t save the day . SkyinBrian (429), Collinsville, Illinois, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Jul 4, 2005 ah, my first non alcoholic beer. not too bad an appearance some color. fairly high carbonation. definately on the sweet side with little to no finish. not quite beer, but not soda. just a fizzy malty beverage that wont get you drunk.
|