 aarossell (151), Grandville, Michigan, USA
Dec 2, 2006 I wanted to give it the benefit of the doubt and say that it gets a bad rap for being N/A, but when I tried it I really did want to throw up immediately. It’s pretty sick...not a brew. not a beer. not in the least bit appealing. do not support this.
jason (1620), Easton, Pennsylvania, USA
Nov 28, 2006 A very shiny can that probably cost more than the beer. Whats funny is that I’ve been drunk enough to try this.
theisti (1638), Leawood, Kansas, USA
Nov 28, 2006 Bottle. Tried one when my wife was pregnant. Pretty much an even more watered down Mich Ultra.
SuperDave70 (1157), Beautiful Sunny Mesa, Arizona, USA
Nov 20, 2006 Updated: Apr 7, 2008Not a terrible alternative to a too sweet soda, but not a good alternative to a beer.
SudsMcDuff (1691), was CapeTown,SA-now Houston, Texas, USA
Nov 15, 2006 This is a non-boozer beer, that in find i tryed but couldn’t really find anything good about this liquid, It looks like beer thats about it, so if you gotta get that fuzz then go O’Douls
Saarlander (1577), Saarlouis, Germany
Nov 6, 2006 Not a good low alc beer, give me 20 different N/A biers from Europe over this one, terrible!
1FastSTi (2551), Glendale, Wisconsin, USA
Nov 5, 2006 meh. Why did they brew this beer? Low in alcohol, yes. It’s also missing flavor, palate, aroma, and well, beer. Ick.
MadIndian (987), Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA
Nov 3, 2006 Updated: Mar 2, 2007There is nothing new that I can add to this that you already haven’t heard. It’s not beer !!!!
|
View Statistics
