phishpond417 (1861), Madison, Wisconsin, USA May 28, 2008 This came first in my experiment, before the Amber and it was awful. I send praise to the heavens that I wasn’t around during the prohibition. This beer was awful. kevin62 (267), New Jersey, USA May 26, 2008 This was from a 12oz bottle.Skunky aroma and taste.This is really not a good beer,I was not expecting much anyway,so I was not surprised. Gypsy19 (604), California, USA May 18, 2008 12-ounce bottle @ The Pied Piper in suburban Sacramento. Better than Budweiser, which isn’t saying much. In other words not as horrible as expected, just a waste of money and stomach space. I still think that St. Pauli NA is the way to go if you absolutely must drink an NA/LA. stefanje (937), (Santee) San Diego, California, USA May 16, 2008 12 oz bottle with dinner at Chilis. This was horrible. Managed to choke down about half before i gave up. I will never have this again, even if it is free. obguthr (987), Poquoson, Virginia, USA May 8, 2008 Weak skunky aroma. Clear yellow, no head. Watery lemon flavor. I thought I detected some cereal, but I think it may have been wishful thinking. daknole (2810), Plantation, Florida, USA Apr 30, 2008 Funny that this is even considered a beer. Why bother with this? Just find a horse track and drink some horse piss instead. MrRain (416), O’Fallon, Illinois, USA Apr 23, 2008 OK, so I tried this beer and thought I’d give the other 11 ozs to the dogs. I am not kidding when I say that the two dogs took over an hour to finish this swill. I don’t know about you but if the dogs won’t drink it..... izzy (10), Richmond, Virginia, USA Apr 18, 2008 Tastes bad, looks bad, smells bad, but it could still be worse. This stuff lingers.
|