reebtogi (3794) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - AUG 30, 2011
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
341mL bottle pours pale golden with small white head and virtually no lacing. Aroma is very mild grain. Taste is very plain with little hops in the finish. Decent carbonation but a light body. Just another run of the mill lager.
michclark (88) - AUSTRALIA - MAY 9, 2011
3.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Slightly better than the bavarian but still lacks real taste of aroma. Nice in appearance but appearances can be deceiving very bland tasting lager.
thepegjett (1260) - Cambridge (via Winnipeg), Cambridgeshire, ENGLAND - AUG 14, 2010
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A - Yeasty and spicy
A - Yellow with thin white head
T - Dry with subtle bitter finish
P - Thin, but nice and crisp
O - Not a bad lager, just a bit light for me
TheHulk (486) - Lethbridge, Alberta, CANADA - JUL 3, 2010
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
The bottle says Original Lager and its a new package but OH WELL.... Not much of a smell there, but if there was, I would call it new and improved cardboard lite! Smells less cardboardy than our usual cardboard! I mean beer! HAha we donít put cardboard in our beer... not much head or lacing or haze, but Iím struggling so Iíll give an extra point for the almost red hue. Taste isnít BAD, but it isnít good either. This isnít sessionable, cuz after 3 Iíd be sick of it and never buy it again, except itís pre-mixed into the multi-box. Why donít they let you make your own multi-box?
Narnad (1406) - Wonder Lake, Illinois, USA - JUN 10, 2010
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Marketed under the Okanagan Springs label. Pours a clear yellow with a small, dense, creamy white head. Aroma has a grainy, slight corny sweetness and a mild spicy noble hops nose. Flavor has a very harsh graininess to it at first, mild lemon note in the middle, slight spicy noble hops toward the end and a sour acidic ending. Body is light and fizzy with a slight dryness at the end. Overall not too enjoyable as the grainy and lemon flavors really donít seem to work well on my palate.
piscator34 (1863) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - JUN 3, 2010
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottled sample via my brother-in-lawís mixed twelve box. Clear gold in colour with strong carbonation. Grainy upfront on the nose, along with some sulfur and a hint of citrus. Flavors are of white bread dough, minerals, and a bit more of that faint citrus note. Medium bodied. Hoppier and better than expected.
Dredd (675) - Bentleigh, AUSTRALIA - JAN 6, 2010
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Acceptable pale lager, nice hoppy notes on the aroma and has a slight sweet maly upfront followed by a firm bitterness.
mcberko (5195) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - OCT 14, 2009
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: NOV 25, 2010 Pours light yellow. Fairly standard pale lager, but better than average for a mass produced one. Weak and watery mouthful. Nothing special.
AaronBouchard (150) - Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CANADA - JUL 27, 2009
2.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Golden body , a good micro lager with a more full bodied taste then mass pale lager , a bit mild and grainy
Cavie (3630) - Fort Worth, Texas, USA - JUL 17, 2009
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Clear golden color. Standard lager aroma. Decent taste. Fairly smooth with an OK sense of tastiness. Is that even a word?