Bricks (591) - Delaware, USA - DEC 29, 2011
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Reminds of a Hefeweizen.. faint citrus on the aroma and taste, aftertaste and palate is a bit foul. Not a great one.
Hkrivera (104) - Guaynabo, PUERTO RICO - JUL 30, 2014
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
First Puerto Rican beer made at microbrewery. Made with German malts, all natural process and made under the German purity law! Go for it!
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
MWMBeerguy (104) - Massachusetts, USA - MAR 3, 2014
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Poured hazy but smelled of wonderful Munich malt. Taste wonderful. No head on this beer but it was a nice example of the style. Very enjoyable.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
Glouglouburp (6007) - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA - JUN 18, 2013
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
In short: A awkwardly fruity golden ale that tastes like old past due-date orange juice. Bad.
How: Tap at brewpub.
The look: Cloudy golden-orange body topped by a persistent small white head.
In long: Nose is a bit fruity (oranges, tangerines) and some corny cereals. Taste is equally fruity with an overall sensation of breakfast juice (orange juice mixed with grapefruit juice). This beer had way too much of an old past due-date orange juice flavor with the awkward acidity. Light body and with a soda-pop carbonation. It is almost refreshing because it is fruity and a bit acidic, but ultimately this is a poorly made beer and it tastes too much like a past due-date fruit juice with carbonation. They were selling gift cards at the brewpub, which raises the question, how much do you need to hate someone for that?
solidfunk (3902) - Washington D.C., Washington DC, USA - FEB 26, 2013
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pretty good for style. Has a nice prominent barley aroma. Low carbonation, very low for style. Pours cloudy yellow with good lacing, no head. Watery consistency. On tap at brewpub.
AGAquino (659) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 22, 2012
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
From notes, on tap at the brewery. Nice example of the style, served fresh and cold.
kramer (4905) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 24, 2012
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Tap, brewpub. Pours a clear pale yellow body with a small fizzy white head. The nose is lightly bready with a touch of a corn like note even though it says that it’s all malt. The flavor is light and laced with corn notes, fairly short finish. Not a whole lot of hops to speak of. Thin and fizzy body, not especially clean or crisp. Not terrible, decent for what it was.
SHIG (3578) - Wasilla, Alaska, USA - APR 21, 2012
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Draft: Poured a clear light with a light white head. Sweet grass aroma. Taste was of soft grain really fresh and smooth.
Jow (2097) - New York, USA - APR 19, 2012
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Tap at the brewery as part of sampler hiding from the rain. pours gold and tastes of wheat, grass, orange citrus, light malt, earth, and leaves. refreshing for beer for the climate it resides
Beershine (5218) - The Sunshine State, Florida, USA - NOV 11, 2011
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
draft @ brewpub. Very nice hellas--crisp and clean with good expression of grassy hops. Refreshing with good sweet malt character too.