RateBeer
overall
99
95
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 2447   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.82   EST. CALORIES: 291   ABV: 9.7%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Three Philosophers is a remarkable limited edition strong ale brewed by Brewery Ommegang in response to a home brewer’s description of his dream beer. Realbeer.com, the internet’s largest beer website, hosted a contest called “Create a Great Beer.” Brewery Ommegang was chosen by Realbeer.com to brew the Belgian-style ale for the winning essayist. Noel Blake, a home brewer from Portland wrote the winning description for what his “dream beer” would be like.


3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
Kasteelfreak (341) - Fallbrook, California, USA - SEP 25, 2004
This is one of the better offerings from Ommegang. The problem with all of their brews is that they have to much yeast and alcahol bite. There's really not much complexity to this. I had a St. Bernardus 12 earlier today and it absolutely blew this away. Maybe I'm not in a great mood, but Ommegang has to be one of the most overrated breweries ever. Thisbeer really does suck

3.4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
beeriodic (61) - Longmont, Colorado, USA - SEP 23, 2004
2004 bottle; color of CocaCola, but a firm, finely-bubbled tan head; estery, ethanol nose; flavor of alcohol is almost overpowering anything else, but warm into a malty,raisin twinged brew. Very dry finish. I had expected more in the yeast, complex flavors and lambic, but don’t really taste it. Big beer, no doubt... maybe too big to leave much intersting behind.

2.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
mdi (573) - Nebraska, USA - SEP 21, 2004
2003 bottle Redish Bruin color, I got the second glass from the bottle and it was yeasty, head faded fast, unimpressive lace. Estery, cherries and figs malt nose. Cherries are dominant. Cherries and malt. I don’t detect any Brett. or lambic-type funk, just an overbearing cherry sweetness. Cloying. I’d rather try this w/o the Lindemans cherry syrup in it. Couldn’t finish my glass.

3.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
igel (196) - New Mexico, USA - SEP 21, 2004
2003 bottling. A mahogany/red color, hazy, and effervescent with orange highlights. The head is a papyrus color with medium retention. Aroma is of dark fruits, esters, alcohol and cherries. Flavor is of caramel, toffee, with some tartness and a mild hop at the finish. The palate is medium bodied and effervescent, with a sweet start tart middle and a metallic finish. IMHO: an interesting interpretation of a quad and I like the addition of a the lambic, but knock my socks off it did not.

3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
robertsreality (2460) - Minnesota, USA - SEP 20, 2004
2004 Vintage: Good Brown Coloring: Good Head. Definitly Some Warming From the Alcoholl. Malt, Bread Dough, Thick Going Down..and a Bit Dry and the End. Can Taste a Hint of the Kreik in the Very Beginning...a Little Cherry Flavor. Overall Not a Bad Brew, But Prefer the Ommegang by Itself...

3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
badgerben (4510) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - SEP 20, 2004
Bottled 2004 Vintage; Tasted September 19, 2004: Solid mahogany color with a medium sized head. Nose of alcohol and bread. The taste was more of the same with a good dose of malt thrown in. I really couldn’t find the cherry taste. Good, but not what I was hoping for.

2.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
Metalhead (632) - Lake Zurich, Illinois, USA - SEP 19, 2004
I really wanted my 100th rating to be something special and given the ratings on this It got my initial vote,until I tatsed this crap again. Had the 2004 fresh and thought it sucked.Now that it is around 8-9 mos old it still sucks. The best part was the look. Poured a beautiful hazy light brown. Beyond that everything about this beer is just so wrong. Mixing and ok lambic with a 2nd rate Belgian(and thats giving them credit) is not a good mix. Bad malty/dry caramally with dry cheap cherries is not a way to score. It was a fucking chore to finish this. I kept looking at it about halfway thru thinking,UUUGH,how much of this crap is left. For the same $ I coulda had 4 pints of Zhiguly Strong and a bag of chips. NEVER again!

4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 17/20
mustang3 (254) - Whitby, CANADA - SEP 18, 2004
My parents got this for me at premier. This is a wonderfully complex beer. IT was almost opaque reddish brown with a quickly dissipating white head. The flavour is initially brown sugar and yeast. There are hints of plums and the finish is fantastic with cherry and coacoa powder notes.

3.7
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
ClarkVV (3892) - Allston, Massachusetts, USA - SEP 13, 2004
UPDATED: NOV 9, 2004 2003 bottle consumed 9/2004. Pours a wonderful maroon-burgundy brown. Light orange and yellows swirl about. Good beige head that sticks to the sides long after it has disipated. Aroma has notes of concord grapes, plums, tobacco, tart cherries, ethanol, mossy/earthy yeast notes and of course, plenty of sweet caramel. Flavor starts out quite dry, moderately sour and really strikes me as more of a flemish sour ale. Though it dosent have nearly the bittersweet/sour flavors, it also dosent have the huge sweet malt profile of say, rochefort 10. A bit of a burnt cherry/ light acetone feel towards the finish, lots of strong alcohol flavors and seems like cherries soaked in extra strong brandy. Warming to room temp proved to allow more of the sweet malt I was looking for to arise, but it never got too dominant. Hints of raisins and chocolate round out the finish, with a dry, strange yeastiness at the end.

2.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
BigBastard (668) - L.A., California, USA - SEP 13, 2004
This one is highly regarded, and I was dying to try it, but was a little disapointed. The lambic was undetectable to me, and the overall flavor of the beer was sort of bland. As it warmed an overwhelming metallic flavor dominated and was not pleasant at all.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 218 219 220  221  222 223 224 » 245


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50