DJMonarch (6777), Northwich, Cheshire, England
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Nov 22, 2009 Updated: Nov 23, 20091. From the Can at the GABF, Colorado Convention Center 25/09/2009
Hoppy aroma. Clear golden coloured floral and hoppy with a crisp and slightly dry malt finish.
2. 355ml Can at the Shag Lounge, Denver 28/09/2009
Some hop aroma. Clear golden coloured and smooth on the palate with a crisp and dry malt finish.
3. On Tap at the Shag Lounge, Denver 28/09/2009
Some hop aroma. Golden coloured and floral with a crisp and dry malt finish. illinismitty (1795), Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Nov 21, 2009 Can at some new metal bar in Nashville. Many people on this site has said that this is one of the better pale lagers. I had not had this in ages so I thought "why the fuck not?" Pours pale golden with a white head. Sweet lagery and corny aroma. Light bodied with the typical macro carbonation. Flavor is basically sweet cereal grains and corn. I really struggled hard to pick up any detectable hops. This stuff is really not any better that the other mass produced pale lagers. I did not finish this. Terrible. fidel (921), Livermore, California, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Nov 12, 2009 Poured pale golden, thin, yellow, grainy, malty, corn, little sweet, dry finish. joechristenson (14), Minnesota, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Nov 5, 2009 While not absolutely repugnant, this beer certainly isn’t worthy of much, excepting college parties and very cheap nights. If you accidentally bought a twelve pack, you can serve it along as a joke with the implicit suggestion that your drinking comrades have no taste. Palate is dreadful, too much carbonation; prickly, I’d say. Not much aroma, though when detectable it’s rather inoffensive. I could definitely taste some corn. jamespgentry (20), Washington, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Nov 2, 2009 why am I even bothering to rate this beer? I must be drunk. Color: piss. Aroma: sweet piss. Flavor: old piss. Basically, drink a gallon of Milwaukee municipal tap water, then piss in to some cans and call it a beer. Voila! PBR! That being said, I drank my fare share in college and continue to frequent it’s ranks at BBQ’s and house parties. What the hell, pick up a twelve pack for old times sake! Elwood (677), Leesburg, Virginia, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Nov 1, 2009 Serving: 12 oz. can.
Appearance: Clear, pale gold color with a foamy, white head. The head is gone in seconds and it leaves behind no lacing.
Aroma: Grainy with notes of corn sugar and a touch of alcohol.
Flavor: Green apple, corn, dry grain, and alcohol. Very watery. This is absolute swill.
Palate: Watery with sparse carbonation and a light mouthfeel. Short, alcohol laden finish.
Overall: This is complete crap. JBVatkeens (9), Florida, USA does not count | 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Nov 1, 2009 I had this beer on tap in a pint glass. This beer had no noticeable aroma and tasted like a odd cross between un-popped popcorn kernels and rice cakes.
|