RateBeer
overall
1
20
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 2401   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.82   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Since 2001, contract-brewed for Pabst Brewing (San Antonio), as Pabst no longer owns a brewery of its own.

http://www.pabstblueribbon.com

Established in Milwaukee in 1844, this is the original Pabst Blue Ribbon beer. Natureís choicest products provide its prized flavor. Only the finest of hops and grains are used. Selected as Americaís Best in 1893.


4.6
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 18/20
Pikes2002 (4) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 30, 2002 does not count
Well, itís no Beast, but itíll pass this Beer Expertís tests. I like the ribbon on the can...I wish I were a BLUE RIBBON CHAMP like PBR!!! Yay for BEER!!!

0.9
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
gsmitty80 (1902) - Washington DC, USA - OCT 27, 2002
What do you want? A PBR. What do you need? A Pabst Blue Ribbon. What do you want? A PBR. Pabst Blue Ribbon Beer. Lol the jingle always gets to me. Not a bad bonging beer and game beer drinking beer.

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
jazz88 (2577) - San Francisco, California, USA - OCT 25, 2002
Tap. A damn fine beer on tap when the set and setting is right.

2.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
DougShoemaker (3147) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 23, 2002
Sweet aroma, pale yellow, with white fluffy head. Grassy, sweet, mildly bitter. Actually a pleasant mouthfeel. Ordinary.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 2/20
DankbrewedDank (162) - East Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - OCT 23, 2002
Established in 1844. The beer must have been really bad back then for Pabst to win a blue ribbon.

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
faulstich (25) - Davis, California, USA - OCT 22, 2002
Better than Bud. Same category. Worse than 95% of whats out there.

1.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - OCT 22, 2002
A lot like Bud, but a smidge better. The other comments from people are amusing. Some people seem really attached to this brew, for some reason.

0.6
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
drismyhero (815) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - OCT 21, 2002
This is really realy gross. I really really didnít like this. Why oh why do people consume this on a regular basis? I just like to make fun of it.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
rolo99 (29) - USA - OCT 20, 2002
Please explain to me how this is considered beer.

1.8
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
npdempse (934) - St. Petersburg, Florida, USA - OCT 15, 2002
Re-rate 10/15/02: Initially gave this a 3.5. What the hell was I thinking? Must be the emotional connection--this used to be my old manís beer of choice. For schwag, it ainít so bad, but, hell, itís still schwag.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 213 214 215  216  217 218 219 » 241


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50