hstreet (71) - Toronto, Ontario, - JAN 24, 2013
3.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Looks lighter and flater than it really is. Overall not a bad economy lager. Decent aroma, taste while leaving a fresh crispness on your palate. What else on the canadian market has a better value than a buck eighty a pint! All around decent.
sccp1910 (145) - BRAZIL - APR 29, 2016
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Aroma discreto, cor dourada e espuma branca. Sabor marcante dos maltes. Boa para uma cervejada.
mrjaxson (439) - .08 Junction, Wisconsin, USA - APR 27, 2016
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Maybe a little corn in the aroma after the pour to a foamy head that quickly dissipates. A little corn sweetness and hop bite, but not much of either. I recall my mid-1980s softball team went to a bar after games, everyone threw 2 bucks on the bar and we drank PBR until the singles were gone. Except they never were. Pabst was inexpensive even in the last century.
PhatCatt (46) - Michigan, USA - APR 24, 2016
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: MAY 5, 2016 Medium body. A very good, pleasant maltimess and nice color (poured into tumbler cup like usual.). I can see why some people like this beer.
commonshawn (923) - Minnesota, USA - APR 21, 2016
1.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 6/20
Can at hells kitchen. Tastes like light grain. A bad beer but that’s its charm. Needs to be very cold and in the right moment.
Hopper8 (24) - Holland, Michigan, USA - APR 18, 2016
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Let’s not get this confused, this is a bad beer. But it is a cheap beer, and it is a drinkable beer, and it isn’t that bad. And besides how many other beers have won a blue ribbon?
___Steve___ (62) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - APR 4, 2016
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bland, overly ascetic and light aroma. Clear, foamless filtered lemon straw colour. Brand, light tasting at first followed by a sweet sugary aftertaste. Uninspiring thirst quencher with little to no character.
AVLarsen (85) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - APR 3, 2016
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Thin in colour and taste. A lawn mower beer. It is mostly harmless to paraphrase...
CrimsonFox (7) - Harrison township, Michigan, USA - APR 3, 2016 does not count
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
King of Econo Beers. You can drink this or Malt Liquer. For the price it will put your feet on the path. You’ll stumble down that path and complain of Hang over but, you’ll be on the path...to somewhere. It’s watery, The tasteless, Cheap. At least it’s not steel Reserve,
mauroruellas (757) - GETULINA, BRAZIL - MAR 28, 2016
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Clara dourada,brilhante,espuma fina;no aroma malte de cereais acrescido de um leve floral;sabor maltado com pequeno amargor ao fundo,boa carbonatação,baixo corpo,refrescante e com "drinkability" até que boa em comparação as similares populares. "SAL" correta sem grandes defeitos.
lennyfiftyseven (1) - Florida, USA - MAR 20, 2016 does not count
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I drank this out of a bottle. not much of an aroma. it looks good. tastes a little bitter. not much body, texture. overall, its better than nothing.