2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20 emacgee (2844) - Carrboro, North Carolina, USA - NOV 17, 2010
Pours a bright pale yellow with a thin foamy white head. Nose is sweet, some corn and hay. A tad metallic and grassy, sweet bready flavor with no hop bitterness, some grassy hops with a crisp twang. Not offensive.
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 TURDFERGUSON (2482) - Carrboro, North Carolina, USA - NOV 17, 2010
Pours super clear, with a yellow tint, kind of looks like a glass that once had beer in it that someone put some water in it to rinse it out and never took the water out. You know what I mean? Nose has some light grass, corn, grain. Kinda sweet flavor, more corn, light hops, metal, ugh.
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 Pinball (7771) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - NOV 13, 2010
bottle at cafe brasil , cph. clear yellow small white head.2. Faint pils aroma4 flavor is mild, slightly flowery, pretty dry, doesnt taste like a pilsener though.
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20 ronaldtheriot (362) - Laplace, Louisiana, USA - NOV 13, 2010
Palma Louca has a thin, white head and a clear, yellow-golden appearance. Carbonation is low to moderate. The aroma is faint, but one can pick up some barley notes. Taste is about as light as one can get, this side of light beer, but some extremely subtle hop spice can be garnered at the back end. Mouth-feel is light and watery, and Palma Louca finishes crisp, but not as dry as American lagers. While there is nothing offensive about the beer, it is very watery, yet not bland, as some underlying tastes can hold one’s interest. I rate it okay.
RJT
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20 madquacker (854) - Canberra ACT, AUSTRALIA - NOV 2, 2010
Yes is be bad. Bloody bad actually. Astringent metallic watery. Dire. Nice label though. No bubbles at all.
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20 Chickencoop (188) - California, USA - OCT 21, 2010
Kind of nasty and un-drinkable, but could be old. It is drinkable but nothing special.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20 LinusStick (2386) - Moon Twp, suburb of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 22, 2010
Just what I was expecting from a commercial Brazilian pale lager. Sampled at one of those outdoor restaurants on Lincoln Road in South Beach. Aroma was very weak. Metallic and sweet. Pour was a flat very light gold with a few rising bubbles and a one finger white head. Taste was more carbonation than anything. Could pick up metallic notes with just faint hints of pilsner malt. Blah
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 dutch23mp (221) - Mount Prospect, Illinois, USA - SEP 11, 2010
12 oz bottle pours like a normal pils but not as much carbonation as one would expect. Decent beer light on the palate with a bit of an aftertaste. Middle of the road brew not bad not outstanding yet decent
|