jason (1689) - Easton, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 21, 2011
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
bottle at the rooftop in charleston. faint scent. flavor was slightly bitter. nice body and a decent mouthfeel
cards04 (2060) - Steinbach, Manitoba, CANADA - FEB 13, 2015
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Not terrible. Just a typical lager that’s more interesting than a macro. Pours a hazy golden. Aromas of corn and caramel. Nice hoppy finish. I guess this is my south Carolina tick. Thanks shrubber85
phaleslu (7107) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - JAN 31, 2015
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
12 oz. bottle from shrubber85- thanks again, Roger! Pours a pale clear gold color with a frothy eggshell white head. Notes of banana, sugar, cream, straw, dough, and pale malts. Light-bodied, with high soft carbonation and a sweet, malty mouthfeel. Actually the best of the three Charleston beers I had.
Zeswaft (1437) - Charleston, South Carolina, USA - JAN 21, 2015
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Bottle. Massive surprise. I expected this brewery to be the Redhook of Charleston. This is goooood. Very grassy and biscuity malts. Closest thing I’ve had to Great Lakes Dortmunder.
eRock_2013 (301) - South Carolina, USA - SEP 1, 2014
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
A surprisingly tasty and flavorful lager, not complex but well done in every category. Appearance is a solid burnished gold with plenty of head and lacing, aroma is a standard but strong pale malt and noble hop combination. Taste is the same, a relatively full flavored pale malt forward taste with a cool grassy/ pilsner-ish Czech hop contrast in the finish. Yet also finishes very clean and refreshing as a good lager should. I was impressed overall and will definitely be buying more of this when I want a simple and straightforward quality pale lager.
slowrunner77 (6336) - Reno, Nevada, USA - AUG 30, 2014
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
1st whiff and sip were typical generic lager, and it went downhill from there. Slightly vegetal offness that makes the flavor and feel more along the lines of crappy macro. Not good
geologyguy (866) - Columbia, South Carolina, USA - AUG 1, 2014
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
smells like a light pilsner....slightly cloudy look...good head...taste is as you would expect from a lighter lager...60-40 malt-hops...finishes maltier...very middle of the road for me
jcartamdg (2280) - Spring Hill, Florida, USA - JUL 9, 2014
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours a light yellow with a thick white head. Aroma of malt, biscuit, banana. Taste is bad, vegetal, plastic, biscuit and lager yeast. This is off
Patrickctenchi (4449) - Cox’s Knob, columbus, Indiana, USA - JUL 1, 2014
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours very bubbly gold with a foamy, off-white head.
Slightly vegetal, grain malt aroma.
Taste is slightly corny....grainy....a bit of Czech-style bitter...
Surprisingly heavy-bodied for the low ABV.
spjensen (97) - Davis, California, USA - MAR 21, 2014
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
On tap, pours golden with a thick white head. A little creamy on the tongue with a lite carbination. A little flat on flavor
Rrauth (1196) - North Carolina, USA - DEC 11, 2013
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
bottle. typical lager. enjoyable but nothing memorable. I have a hard time learning the nuances of a good lager.