OldJack99 (114) - USA - APR 28, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
íHe drank Pearl in a can and jack Daniels black, chewed tobacco from a mail pouch sackí
David Allen Coe sang that so I bought some, a watery coors/bud smooth beer, not bad cold. Some of the cheapest beer Iíve ever bought.
Caytinator (776) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - JUL 30, 2013
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz can. Not the worst macro lager Iíve had - itís a good bad beer. The smell is a little ugly and unappealing, but the taste is fine, just a touch of toast and slightly bitter. Some basic cereals and basic malts, nothing fancy with the light hops. Light body, well carbonated. What can you say, itís a "classic" - whatever that means.
docsteigs (492) - Texas, USA - JUL 20, 2013
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
No major deficiencies. A macro light lager with a little but more nose and body than competitors, and has a nice pour with head retention too. Good lawnmower.
zach8270 (3047) - Henrietta, New York, USA - APR 24, 2013
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
(can - 12 oz - The Esquire - San Antonio, TX) Pale gold pour with a soapy white head. Generic beer aroma with some light corn and grass. Flavor is mild corn, grass and can taste. Watery but refreshing when in a hot climate.
rondphoto (1250) - Lakeside Park, Kentucky, USA - NOV 23, 2010
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
This is definitely better than water, because there is a small flavor of pale ale in the palate. After that, it is all water. Whatís not to like? (actually, whatís to like?)
durhambeer (2500) - Durham, North Carolina, USA - OCT 22, 2010
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Sweet can. Good all icy cold. Woman beside me asked sincerely: "is this beer or water?" Answer: yes.
JoeAgain (66) - New Jersey, USA - JUL 17, 2010
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Poor, poor Pearl. A beer that I very much enjoyed while in Texas in the mid-seventies, reduced to a name brand sans a real Pearl brewery, with nary a resemblence to its former self.
Pours very light, with a small head, and pretty fizzy. Looks, and somewhat smells, like a cream soda. Very light on the palate, thin and watery. Fizz and some cereal grain flavor, with very little in the way of hops.
Iím almost sorry I even tried this beer, again. I would have preferred remembering it as it once was.
SledgeJr (3577) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - JUN 30, 2010
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
In the can at Taste of Texas in San Antonio. Pours pale yellow with a fizzy white head. Vegetal marmite corn pone aroma. This as water and far less refreshing. Is this beer slowly dissolving its can? So metallic that it seems so.
ronaldtheriot (973) - Laplace, Louisiana, USA - APR 25, 2010
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
NOTE: I bought this 12 pack of 12 oz. cans in Beaumont, Tx. Pearl beer is not sold in Louisiana. Pearl has a thick, white head, and very clear and bubbly golden appearance, and a faint aroma. The taste, while mild, has a roasted aspect, which prevents it from being bland. Mouth-feel is light and watery. Pearl finishes crisp and satisfying. Overall, this is a good beer and I recommend a sample, if it can be found.
italianjohn (2149) - Penndel, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 5, 2010
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Clear golden pour white head with lacing .... corn metallic sweet corn aroma ...... taste of sweet malt corn doesnít have a crap skunk taste so its not bad for crap but still macro lager crap in a can went well for texas beer
Barreras (746) - Diamond Bar, California, USA - AUG 15, 2009
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours a very light yellow, almost clear with no distinct aroma. Tastes very metallic and watery. A very bland non distinct light beer.