obxdude10 (2150) - Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 29, 2012
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Very poor excuse for a pilsener. I’m not sure which brewer’s claim to the pilsener style is more far-fetched: Miller Lite or this Peter’s Brand. Man, this is horrible! The beer pours a light straw color and has no discernible aroma. The body is actually a little heavy, as I was feeling a little "full" after two 16-oz cans. This beer also has very little flavor. I got only a small amount of hops in the finish, along with the stale corn and shoe sole flavors.
BVery (8656) - Plymouth, Minnesota, USA - JUL 16, 2012
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: DEC 30, 2013 Can. Clear pale golden/yellow pour with a white head. Cheap grain, slightly sweet, a bit malt-liquor like but ’softer’ than that. Beats BMC - barely.
cohomebrewer (8) - Washington, USA - JUN 4, 2012 does not count
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Clear, with a very thin white head. Not much in the flavor department- very little grain, some piney hop flavor. This is a cheap beer. It tastes like a cheap beer. But it does come in a standard pint can. That’s a plus. And it’s better than Bud.
Scrapersnbeer (1531) - Boston, Massachusetts, USA - MAY 26, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Aroma of grass, apple and corn. Medium amber color. Medium sweetness with a finish that’s metallic and salty. Light body that feels heavier the more you drink, feels more like a toned down US malt liquor than straight cheap lager. Dry at first, but this feature also wears off. Well priced Euroswill style lager.
JohnnyJ (5069) - San Diego, California, USA - MAY 23, 2012
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Can. Clear with a fizzy white head. Cheap grain, sweet corn, lightly musty, and some lingering bitterness. Not bad for how cheap it is, could be decent swill.
joebudzjoe (671) - Connecticut, USA - MAY 5, 2012
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Tall boy can from a friends house. tastes like an American macro with a salty aftertaste. Rather have a Busch light
maxwelldeux (4219) - Snohomish, Washington, USA - MAY 4, 2012
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
This pours well with a nice color, but goes downhill. This has that odd sweet taste that is common in cheap lagers. The smell isn’t much better, having the same sweet smell.
rubbishystuff (2109) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - APR 8, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: JAN 27, 2015 From Trader Joe’s. Starts OK when it is cold. Tastes like any other pale euro lager. As it warms some stale flavors start to come through. Not fantastic at all. Serving: Can
thegreenrooster (3638) - St.louis, Missouri, USA - JAN 14, 2012
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pour is a dull blonde with a fizzy white head. Aroma is nothing. Some pale malts I guess. Flavor does have a dry pils malt but nothing shows up after that. Finish is wet paper bag. A meh Dutch lager brewed in Germany. It cost a buck at Trader Joes.
seymour (1749) - Maplewood, Missouri, USA - OCT 31, 2011
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Poured pint can from Trader Joe’s into a nucleated pint glass. Clear light golden color with average white foam which dissipated quickly, leaving little lace. Neutral aroma except for some adjunct corn, but less offensive than most cheap American lagers. I don’t have the metallic complaint other raters have mentioned, either. Flavor was predictable: straw, grain, mild malt, only a hint of hops bitterness. Labelled "A Dutch Style Pilsener" but it’s definitely less hoppy, less pilsener malty, less complex, less dry and less carbonated than classic examples. Not bad for $.99, but there’s so much better beer out there.