RateBeer
Home >

Petes Wicked Red Rush

 (RETIRED)
overall
23
15
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 124   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.6   EST. CALORIES: 159   ABV: 5.3%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
From the moment you pop the top, it’s obvious Pete’s Wicked Red Rush isn’t an ordinary ale. "Engineered to deliver a heightened effervescence, our American Red Ale is WICKEDLY charged! Discover the RUSH... Get Wicked!


2.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 8/20
SiddFinch (155) - Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 23, 2002
Effervescence is not something I typically appreciate in a beer. Reminded me of an alcoholic soda.

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
NightOwl (45) - Midland, Michigan, USA - DEC 22, 2002
Umm... no. Just say no. Pick a different Pete’s, because he makes some good brews. This just isn’t one of them.

3.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 16/20
Tippie4 (97) - Auburn, Maine, USA - DEC 20, 2002

2.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
ElGaucho (2156) - Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA - DEC 6, 2002
Moderate malt aroma; small sized, creamy, off-white head; mostly diminishing. Orange in color. Mostlyt malty with an ever so suble bitterness. Too malty! Get some hops, Pete!!

2.6
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Vikingbeau (67) - Albertville, Minnesota, USA - DEC 6, 2002
this bitch’s name is red rush but she is orange in appearance. it tastes like pop. she has an appearance you can see right through but gives absolutely no head and wears no lace. palate is lame. overall soft.

1.9
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 8/20
Sturgess (173) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 1, 2002
Not a bad red ale....I would reccomend Rock Creek’s Red Ale over this any day however.

2.5
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
gsmitty80 (1741) - Washington DC, USA - NOV 25, 2002
Decent Petes brew not my favorite. Hoppy but a bit watered down as well. A little flavor to it but not that much.

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
obxdude10 (1971) - Limerick, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 25, 2002
Pretty lame brew, not a whole lot of flavors happening, very disappointing

1.9
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 10/20
uhorpheus (215) - houston, Texas, USA - NOV 22, 2002
Very dissapointed. I tend to like the Wicked Ale for an everyday drinking beer, but his was horrible. Very bitter, but not from hops. Not much flavor at all. Head looked as cheap as a miller lite.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
Holdwine (1071) - Beertimore, Maryland, USA - NOV 9, 2002
More like Red Mush. Barely tolerable. Very weak effort from Pete’s. I guess it is like an amber, but it misses on so many levels. Not much hops going. Carbonated sourness is an apt description.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5 6  7  8 9 10 11 12 13


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50