RateBeer
overall
5
5
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 30   MEAN: 1.92/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.06   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Translation: Brewed from first class sorts of grain, pleasantly bitter and with a specific aroma.


4.2
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
DasZajecarac (1) - SERBIA - SEP 30, 2011 does not count
Only Pils Plus in 0.5l bottle is original one, because Brewerie in Zaječar have its own water source so beer have great aroma and its very tasty for drinking

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
CaptBier (323) - Birmingham, Alabama, USA - JUL 5, 2009
.5 Liter bottle. I tend to not like pilseners but I found this one to be quite nice. I think it was that it had a bit more hoppiness to it which is what I look for in a beer. I liked it.

2.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
artyom (435) - Osijek, CROATIA - NOV 14, 2013
0,5l can. Golden color with nice lacing. Malty aroma and taste. Some bitterness. Overall it is refreshing beer, but nothing special.

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
yespr (30755) - Copenhagen O, DENMARK - OCT 19, 2011
From tap at Queens Pub. Pours clear and golden yellow with a small white head. Aroma is mild cornish and light grassy. Cornish and light grassy flavoured. Bitter and dry finish.

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
ogivlado (5584) - Zagreb, CROATIA - SEP 7, 2004
Sampled draught on Belgrade Beer Fest2004. -just another ordinary beer with nothing special to say, pale yellow, medium head, hoppy and refreshing

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
estpiwo (1277) - ESTONIA - JUL 30, 2011
0,33L bottle and can also. It is interesting , but beer in can was better than in bottle. More hops and more flavor. I tried that beer in draft also - at the beginning it was good, but after not so interesting. Drinkable.

2.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Eructoblaster (2957) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - AUG 19, 2010
Can - 500ml. Boring pale gold body with a decent white frothy head. Fair malty/hoppy aroma with flowery hints. Taste is thin and one-dimensioned. It carries metallic notes and ends with a short bitter/herbal finish. Average macropils.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
visionthing (2617) - Oslo, NORWAY - FEB 6, 2013
33cl bottle at the apartment in Belgrade. This was the first beer of the trip. Late in the evening it was still around 30 degrees outside and we were told that it was the hottest day of the year so far. Quite standard and boring pale lager, but under these circumstances it was quite nice. Medium sweet and malty with a light bitterness in the finish. Quite refreshing on the balcony in the heat. (Backlog: tasted 2010-08-27)

2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
Rune (7775) - Tromsø, NORWAY - OCT 3, 2012
500ml can bought at a Maxi store in central Belgrade. Shared with Finn back home. Crystal clear, straw coloured body. Diminishing white head, spotty lacing. Grainy malts to the nose. Pale malts in flavour with fruity hints, notes of peaches. Dry ending with sour malts. Drinkable euro lager (Tromsø, 20.09.2012).

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
heavy (2120) - Split, CROATIA - MAY 31, 2009
UPDATED: AUG 26, 2011 Old rating:
0.33 l green bottle courtesy of Doggythedog, thanks for sharing! It poured pale golden body with smaller head. Overwhelming grainy aroma, dusty and a bit herbal. Pretty unpleasant, but I get used to this on pale lagers. Flavor is grainy as well, somewhat bitterish, but totally crappy. Medium bodied. Short finish, this time not really unpleasant, just ordinary grainy and malty. Quite boring and a bit ugly brew. 2/2/4/2/6=1.6

New comments made 16/08/2011:
From this summer it’s marketed as a "must try summer beer", I believe they modified its recipe. Anyhow, it didn’t smell offensive, rather weak, but fine lemony hoppy. Flavor was a bit grainy, lemony and pretty watery again. They’ve watered it down, yet improved the taste. Good marketing. Aroma and overall impression go +2, it’s not so offensive anymore.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50