beerexpert100 (9) - Larnaca, CYPRUS - MAY 7, 2015 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
The color on the pour is a crystalline gold with a prosperous white head that is also creamy in texture, with the lace a fine veil to conceal the glass. Nose is prototypical lager fresh and sweet, nicely malted with the start sweet and the top light to moderate in feel.
DasZajecarac (1) - SERBIA - SEP 30, 2011 does not count
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Only Pils Plus in 0.5l bottle is original one, because Brewerie in Zaječar have its own water source so beer have great aroma and its very tasty for drinking
CaptBier (323) - Birmingham, Alabama, USA - JUL 5, 2009
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
.5 Liter bottle. I tend to not like pilseners but I found this one to be quite nice. I think it was that it had a bit more hoppiness to it which is what I look for in a beer. I liked it.
artyom (774) - Osijek, CROATIA - NOV 14, 2013
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
0,5l can. Golden color with nice lacing. Malty aroma and taste. Some bitterness. Overall it is refreshing beer, but nothing special.
yespr (37030) - Copenhagen O, DENMARK - OCT 19, 2011
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
From tap at Queens Pub. Pours clear and golden yellow with a small white head. Aroma is mild cornish and light grassy. Cornish and light grassy flavoured. Bitter and dry finish.
ogivlado (6651) - Zagreb, CROATIA - SEP 7, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Sampled draught on Belgrade Beer Fest2004. -just another ordinary beer with nothing special to say, pale yellow, medium head, hoppy and refreshing
estpiwo (1319) - ESTONIA - JUL 30, 2011
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
0,33L bottle and can also. It is interesting , but beer in can was better than in bottle. More hops and more flavor. I tried that beer in draft also - at the beginning it was good, but after not so interesting. Drinkable.
MarkoNm (1899) - Novo mesto, SLOVENIA - JAN 5, 2015
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours a clear golden color. Topping it is a white frothy head. Basic mild malty aroma, some grainy notes in there. Slight sweetness in teh start, perhaps a bit watery, with mild bitterness in the finish. Nothing offensive, drinkable.
Eructoblaster (3477) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - AUG 19, 2010
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Can - 500ml. Boring pale gold body with a decent white frothy head. Fair malty/hoppy aroma with flowery hints. Taste is thin and one-dimensioned. It carries metallic notes and ends with a short bitter/herbal finish. Average macropils.
visionthing (3887) - Oslo, NORWAY - FEB 6, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
33cl bottle at the apartment in Belgrade. This was the first beer of the trip. Late in the evening it was still around 30 degrees outside and we were told that it was the hottest day of the year so far. Quite standard and boring pale lager, but under these circumstances it was quite nice. Medium sweet and malty with a light bitterness in the finish. Quite refreshing on the balcony in the heat. (Backlog: tasted 2010-08-27)