dev (50) - Savannah, Missouri, USA - DEC 29, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Really skunky taste. Looked good,nice color.good head.Will try this one again and will probably rerate then. Only had one.
hayden1215 (321) - Ohio, USA - DEC 29, 2002
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: JUL 10, 2003 golden in color, decent head with lacing, flowery aroma. Excellent hoppy bitter flavor and finish.
Bronstein (175) - Göttingen, GERMANY - DEC 29, 2002
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
Golden color, creamy head. Sweet aroma. Some malty flavours but aroma hops are dominating. This ’original’ pilsner is not very dry or herbal. Medium body. Surprisingly full flavoured for the amount of alcohol. Very drinkable. Unfortunately pasteurized.
Brisbane (24) - SWEDEN - DEC 28, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle. Light amber, apple-cider color. Tastes warm even from the fridge. Lots of action in the
mouth. Mild musty smell with a rusty, oxidated taste. Sweetish and tart. Not a knock-out,
because it is a pilsner, but at good one at that. Not much to say for or against this brew.
PorterPounder (5344) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - DEC 27, 2002
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: OCT 15, 2004 Rerate Still a damn good pils, but notice a bit less sweetness this time and a little more saaz bitterness/skunkiness. Still very smooth and refereshing though. Original 3.9 At first blush one thinks it is a Becks/St Pauli/Heineken clone - but it is much more than that. Nice, even light malty aroma, tight, bubbly pour with a moderate lacing white head. Golden appearance that has "classic beer" written all over it. Not a pilsener lover but if I am going to have one - this is how I want it to taste. Nice sweet undertones accentuate the classic dry pilsener flavor. Stays strong throughout. Glad I finally found a place that sold a single of this!
Jfishback13 (275) - Royal Oak, Michigan, USA - DEC 26, 2002
3.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
This was quite good, especially for a pilsner. I’m glad a pilsner buddy made me try it, I’ll probably have this again a few times.
rmalloy (199) - los angeles, California, USA - DEC 25, 2002
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: OCT 2, 2006 One of my go to beers. Extremely refreshing. Very light, with tasty hop flavors. Easy quaffer. It can’t get high ratings because it’s not complex; still, it’s a good beer.
GermanBrews76 (678) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - DEC 25, 2002
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
On tap here in America. Seems like a good idea to me. Less likely to be monthss old. Dark golden color, with hints of amber. Crystal clear body, much darker that I expected. Very light, crisp malts, mildly hopped. Real clean! Smells like some cereal grain is in there too. Wow, lots ot barley And grainy taste. Kind of fizzy, but that should be expected, I suppose. Mild notes of subdued hops on the sides of the tongue. Certainly deserves It’s reign as the "gold standard" for a pilsener!
MrGregAD199 (65) - Medford, Oregon, USA - DEC 24, 2002
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
ogivlado (5539) - Zagreb, CROATIA - DEC 24, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottled(500ml). -for me Budweiser is better