rodzilla79 (90) - Maryland, USA - AUG 7, 2010
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
It’s not a great beer, or even a good beer given normal conditions. Although after a hot day on the beach at St. Lucia it tastes pretty darn good.
ciaranc (782) - Dublin, IRELAND - JUN 29, 2014
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Draught at Grand Pineapple, Antigua. Pale yellow Caribbean lager, yellow, fizzy, decent white head. Not much aroma, grainy notes. Taste is a nice dry malt. Watery, fizzy, short finish. Entirely inoffensive, works well in the 30 degree heat.
ryanscourt (662) - Latrobe, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 27, 2014
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Drinkable. Clean. Pale lager. Akin to a carona, though not the big market. Lime would add flavor i guess.
mzaar (1508) - Varberg, SWEDEN - APR 4, 2014
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Flaska på restaurant i Castries, St Lucia. Hälls upp guldfärgad med medelstort vitt skum. Blaskig i både doft och smak, där gräs och majs är det enda som märks av. Kolsyrig munkänsla. Men ett nytt land blev det i alla fall.
MoleyBub (5) - Alabama, USA - MAR 4, 2014 does not count
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
"Slightly beery" is the way to describe this offering. On draft in St Lucia hotels and in bottle in the airport at the bar. Very pale, reasonable effervescence, almost nothing on the nose and very cold. Insigniificant bitterness. Draft was served in small plastic glasses. On draft and in bottle it had little flavor with no outstanding features. All in all a disappointment as it is really the only offering on the island of St Lucia.
Vladivostok (227) - Buckinghamshire, ENGLAND - FEB 8, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Meh... I really can’t say this is an appalling beer, I’ve tasted a lot worse but it really doesn’t have much going for it other than the refreshing qualities that you find in most lagers if served ice cold. A little sharper and slightly more sour than some although the hop rate is still quite low. On the other hand if St. Lucia had great beer then it really would have too much going for it for one little island.
SHIG (3537) - Wasilla, Alaska, USA - FEB 2, 2014
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle: Poured a golden with thin white head. Aroma was a little slinky cardboard. Taste was mild to sour grain, very thin and wet. Smooth finish.
northropfrye (2082) - Steinbach, Manitoba, CANADA - FEB 1, 2014
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Thanks Lauren for the st lucia tick. Initially a blast of sweetness. Taste is sweet grain maybe some corn. Pretty regular lager.
Big_Pete (32) - Missouri, USA - JAN 10, 2014
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A pretty bad beer. It doesn't quite make it to a spot on my "beers so bad, they're good" list. Was almost like Bud Light in every way. Another country off of my list.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
two7offsuit (132) - Massachusetts, USA - DEC 25, 2013
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Another pale yellow Caribbean beer that goal is not flavor but rather to be refreshing when served cold on a beach in St. Lucia
Cuso (4206) - Bratislava, SLOVAK REPUBLIC - NOV 8, 2013
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle kindly shared by MisoW, many thanks. Pale golden with small white head. Cooked vegetable, corn in aroma. Taste, almost the same. Bad, but new country tick. Country #97.