dekester1 (318) - Neenah, Wisconsin, USA - MAR 11, 2012
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pours a light gold with a light head and lacing. Aroma was of slightly sweet malts. Taste of primarily of 2-row barley malt with a light hop grassy finish. Palate is a bit on the thin side. Overall, a decent light ale, although I thought it was a bit pricey considering whatís there (or not).
askewbrew (18) - Edmond, Oklahoma, USA - AUG 17, 2014
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Pours out to a thin white head and light gold-yellow color. No lacing. Aroma is light malts and floral/spicy hops. Flavor does more of the same with a crisp, dry grainy finish. Mouthfeel is light for style. Overall a pretty decent brew.
gregwilsonstl (1104) - Missouri, USA - JUN 28, 2014
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
Smells green bottle beer. Really Light. Corn. Pretty standard lager. Thanks erin.
vomit (168) - Michigan, USA - JUN 14, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Over the years I have "known" a number of blondes I wanted to have "drop dead" none the least of these a certain ex- of mine.....but I digress. This beer may be easy like most blondes but wonít satisfy you like a slutty Blatz will. Think about it.
HuskerTan (516) - Holdrege, Nebraska, USA - FEB 6, 2014
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A- Grains, cereal, malts, water.
A- Golden color, clear liquid, minimal head.
T- Grains, corn, water, cereal.
P- Light body, average texture, high carbonation, abrupt finish.
O- Tastes like just about every macro beer out there. If I was doing a blind taste test Iíd say this was a Corona. Very little difference at all. Just pretty bland. Although itís still not horrible. Might be better with a lime in it.
Stevesie (326) - - DEC 26, 2013
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
From bottle. Light color, underwhelming nose. Passable perhaps in extreme heat or when Bud is the only alternative. Light, watery, forgettable.
rlpeeler (92) - Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA - NOV 10, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottled from the grocery on sale cheap. Aroma is of wet dog, taste is similar. Possibly a better alternative than ulta lite as it has a bit of watery body. Not recommended.
shrubber85 (7738) - Greenville, Indiana, USA - AUG 23, 2013
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle. Perfume and barley malt aroma. Golden yellow with nice head. Lightly sweet barley malt flavor. Very light body. Most macros are better than this.
JokerSF (1) - - AUG 22, 2013 does not count
3.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
If youíre a Bud light / Miller Light drinker, then this is a good alternative for you. Overall, itís a decent beer with a pleasant aftertaste and less than average calories. (On a side note: Contrary to what this page states at the top, this beer is 4.1% ALC/VOL per the label.)
queenholly (2987) - South Whitley, Indiana, USA - JUL 28, 2013
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle. Barely perceptible sweet grainy malt aroma - Iíve tried some bad macros that had more to offer aroma-wise. Slightly hazed pale gold with a small white head, no retention. Light sweet grainy malt and very light bitter flavor. Light body, soft carbonation.
tablasco (1) - Illinois, USA - MAY 31, 2013 does not count
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
I thought it was an APA, but it tasted lighter and not hoppy. A golden appearance, hence the name. minimal head, light sweetness, light body. I would drink it again, it was a nice party beer.