ancherrera (162) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 19, 2006
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Can;t fariley rate this beer as I am biased. Drank it in Venezuela during college break. Takes me back to some good times. The beer? Oh yeah.... It was like any other macrobrew.
mabjork (674) - Vasa, FINLAND - APR 16, 2006
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Canned. Pale yellow in colour. Vanishing white head. It has a malty and watery aroma. It has a vegetable flavour, kinda watery and sweet at the same time.
TBone (13118) - Pori, FINLAND - APR 14, 2006
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Can 355ml, alc. 5% (BB 03/2006)
What to say? Good things first: Can has nice photo of Deisy Arvelo. Then ... Pale yellow, creamy white head. Vegetables, sweet corn aroma. Light, sweet malty and papery flavor.
oh6gdx (21061) - Vasa, FINLAND - APR 14, 2006
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Canned (5%). Pale yellow colour, small white head. Aroma is maize and cooked vegetables. The same in flavour, with some weird sweetness. Watery. Crappiest of the three Venezuelans we "enjoyed" at the rating session.
rickgordon (3845) - Göteborg, SWEDEN - MAR 22, 2006
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottled. Sampled at Delirium Café, Göteborg.
Pale golden. Aroma from boiled vegetables and a hint of selery. Small notes of honey in flavour, little sweetish and somewhat raw mouthfeel. The finish is even sweeter an not very pleasant.
NoiZe (2324) - Amersfoort, NETHERLANDS - FEB 17, 2006
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Very standard lager. Looks ok and flavor is not bad, but far from interesting. Too mainstream. Carbonated. Just another light brew..
gladstone (23) - NORWAY - FEB 8, 2006
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
One bottle of this is enough. I didn’t enjoy it at all. Very light, flavorless, non-existant body (felt like lake water being forced down my throat) Flavor is sour and weak. Steer clear of this one, it is one of the worst lagers I have had. No good.
nicolaad30 (6) - USA - JAN 21, 2006 does not count
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Nice looking beer.... not a great flavor, and it is served almost frozen, then I supose that at normal serving temperatures it sucks. I let one open for a while to check results on its flavor without sparkle and it had a shitty flavor and no aroma....
gws57 (1275) - Saint Charles, Illinois, USA - JAN 14, 2006
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Had this one bottled in Oranjestad, Aruba. Yeeeuck. This one should have been served with a lime to cut the bitter aluminum taste. Hideous.
Nekronos (3658) - Xalapa, MEXICO - DEC 26, 2005
3.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Like most of the lagers, but with a feature of Pilsner, reminds me a little the Holsten. With honey backtaste.