jsou (20) - Plymouth, Massachusetts, USA - FEB 14, 2006
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
One of the guys at my local liquor store suggested this when I was in looking for Urquell. This is no Urquell! Drinkable, but unremarkable at best. Light in taste and color. Somewhat fizzy.
shrubber85 (8240) - Greenville, Indiana, USA - JAN 27, 2006
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Sour malt and slightly fishy aroma. Golden yellow color with moderate head. Slight sour malt and light hops flavor with moderate carbonation. Decent for a Carribean lager.
Kosovar (48) - repentigny, Quebec, CANADA - JAN 24, 2006
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Ah! le plaisir des îles dominicaines aurait bien pu se passer d’une telle eau de vaiselle, qui, je doit m’en convaincre, coule assez bien. J’en ai fait l’expérience au Québec, peut-être faut-il la boit en République!
Birdiebeagle (958) - Perkasie, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 19, 2006
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
bottle Pours a gold with a fizzy white head. Has a malty aroma. Taste was a touch thin but not bad. I drank quite a few while on vacation in the Dominican.
yayforbeer (753) - Orange Park, Florida, USA - JAN 14, 2006
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale golden lager with a fizzy white head. Mild aroma and flavor. Watery and unimpressive yet unoffensive. I was surprized to see its 6% abv. Drinkable and refreshing. I’ve had worse.
Kevinusa (1) - USA - JAN 12, 2006 does not count
4.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
This beer taste very good, it´s one of the best beer i´ve tried so far! two thumbs up!
JoeMcPhee (8746) - Toronto, ON, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 4, 2006
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Thanks to my sister for dragging this one back from the Dominican. Very pale golden colour, thin white head. Pale malt aroma, a trace of grassiness. Quite clean tasting. No skunkiness, no metallic character. Flavour is quite thin and non-descript but there is a bit of malt some light grassy hop flavour. Pretty quaffable and much better than I would have thought.
wheatbeerboy (103) - Addison, Illinois, USA - DEC 28, 2005
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
I tried this beer when I was in Puerto Rico. My father-in-law is from the Dominican Republic and he wanted me to try it. I didn’t think it was all that bad.
Fish (440) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - DEC 26, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Surprisingly didn’t like this stuff as much as it’s lighter brother. This is perhaps the first light/heavy pair that I have preferred in such an order. The main difference between Presidente and Presidente Light, I’d say, is a honey sweetness the malts have; though unfortunately this only brings out the sour flavor of the malt. Stick with the light stuff, it comes in bigger bottles anyway.
Nekronos (3737) - Xalapa, MEXICO - DEC 25, 2005
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: APR 30, 2006 NOt so good. It has this honney alike aroma, that same Holsten has. The flavour is a little normal, not bad at all.