biomechanic (55) - Washington, USA - SEP 8, 2003
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
I lived on this for 3 days while I stayed at the Dominican Republic. It was good and refreshing, better than most macros.
thehoff (569) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - SEP 2, 2003
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
For a pilsner it was a nice suprise and was better than any other Central American beer I have had. It really is best in a pool, in the Dominican, with Merengue playing in the background . I have have American Pilsners that are much worse.
Suttree (4736) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - AUG 23, 2003
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Here are some things that I suppose taste bad, but I have never tasted: Piss (donkey, dog, horse or otherwise), bongwater, raw sewage, swill (what is that, anyway?), and moose sweat. Here is is some thing that I know tastes bad: Presidente.
MAP (1133) - Lakewood, Ohio, USA - AUG 14, 2003
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Alright, so its not the best beer in the world, but im sure it wasn't trying to be. At least now i can say I've had beer from the dominican republic thats better than almost every macrobrew.
SJP (483) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 2, 2003
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Orangy yellow color with a thin head. Sweet nose and taste, but not very exciting. Too freakin' bad I have a case of this stuff now.
Hopistotle420 (1178) - Amherst, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 27, 2003
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pale golden. Small white head. Grainy, industrial nose. Sweet, grainy and thin...Drinkable, but I probably wont touch it again.
JoeyT (8) - New York, USA - JUL 24, 2003 does not count
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Decent drinkable beer. Small head, dissipates quickly. Clear, amber. Light taste, slight skunky aftertaste. I remember it tasting MUCH better on tap in the Dominican Republic (I was there twice). Perhaps it was fresher there.
iwantalambic (1478) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - JUL 20, 2003
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
22 oz. bottle: pours a pretty nice straw color with a nice head with some tight bubles. . . But the aroma takes your breath away - it is that bad: stale wet metallic hay. . . Flavour is slightly sour with, strange bit of orange flavour, light hops and straw, none of which are appealing to me at all. . .
Jokes (1453) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUL 19, 2003
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Not the best beer I've ever had. The aroma started very skunky, but turned to an odd sort of corn/barley combo that did little for me. The finish was sort of bitter. The flavor was dominated by the corn. A touch hopppy. Decently refreshing, but overall, it's not that good.
mixamatt (427) - San Francisco, California, USA - JUL 4, 2003
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Mild skunk hop aroma.Better than average head.Crisp dry flavor with strong carbonation.Slight soapy aftertaste.I'm impressed that the label list corn grits as an ingredient.Is this beer really 6%.