wiseman (6) - Washington DC, USA - JUL 5, 2005 does not count
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
surprisingly good pilsner. I think the other raters may have gotten an old one, I liked this one. Not quite as good as Pilsner Urquell, etc, but very good. Cheap too!
bkurtz (866) - PERU - JUN 27, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
(bottle) Poured a typical pale yellow. Smooth, but little taste. What a shame.
blankboy (6277) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 27, 2005
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle shared with GregClow, tupalev & jerc -- courtesy of jerc. Thank goodness I shared this one, I’d hate to have a whole bottle of this to myself. Pours a pale yellow with a small, mostly diminishing, white head. Skunky aroma. (Stupid green bottles!) Flavour is grainy malts and corn but in the worst way. This is awful.
GregClow (2914) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 18, 2005
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle shared with blankboy, tupalev & jerc - courtesy of jerc. Pale yellow colour, skunky aroma. Flavour is bland and grainy. Not very good.
Gorbalev (2958) - Ontario, CANADA - JUN 18, 2005
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Why must we do this to ourselves? Sort of derailed the quality tasting (labatt notwithstanding) but a new country, horray! Offensive dark yellow corn taste. Yuck. I wouldn’t bring this beer within a hundred leagues of my city.
jercraigs (8073) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 17, 2005
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
UPDATED: JUL 3, 2005 Re-Rate July 1 2005. Can. In substantially better shape than the bottle I sampled. Pale yellow, smallish white head. Vegetal corny (?) aroma mixed with grain and muted hops. Similar flavour, little less corn in the flavour. Remind me of a slightly less malty Heineken actually. Meh. Uninspired but I could knock back a few on the beach if given the opportunity. 5/3/5/2/10 <P>
Original Rating Bottle. Courtesy or Mssr. Poirier. Pale macro yellow with a small white head diminishes fast. Bit hops if grainy and or mildly skunky.Touch of bitterness, fairly watery. I also have a can from the Mattecky Honeymoon in the fridge, perhaps it will have fared better on the trip.
crazyvin (1994) - New York, USA - JUN 6, 2005
1.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
light, watery yet still slightly enjoyable. Mostly greian like malt flavors with out any hops what so ever. smooth finish. Good on hot days.
Nejhleader (1269) - Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 31, 2005
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: MAR 25, 2006 parents brought me home a six pack from the dominican republic, don’t know how they got that through customes but hey whatever.. fairly light, smooth, went down easy but nothing special. I like it.
robpet (98) - Stone Mountain, Georgia, USA - MAY 3, 2005
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
The bottle says a Pilsener type beer. What the heck is that? It did have a slight pilsener like aroma and taste, but most it was just sort of average lager. It started poor, seemed to get better toward the middle of the glass, and then finished poor. Go figure. Slightly watery taste, more bitter finish than the average American lager, but still not a great beer.
raymow (850) - Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 28, 2005
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Better than I expected, though I wasn’t expecting much. Drinkable, but I wouldn’t go out of my way trying to find this one.