RateBeer
overall
30
35
style
Brewed by Quidi Vidi Brewing Company
Style: Amber Ale
Quidi Vidi Village, St.Johns, Canada

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

Local Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 110   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.91/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
1892 Traditional Ale was the first beer ever brewed at Quidi Vidi Brewery. This exceptional ale is brewed using the finest two row malt and North American and European hops. Rich malt sweetness which is balanced by the perfect amount of mild hop bitterness. Pours a rich amber color and offers a clean finish


2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
fata2683 (2176) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - MAY 17, 2010
bottle pours light amber with a tall off white head. Aroma is noble hops and grassy malts. Flavor is rich pale and caramel malts, bittersweet with a toffee bite. Clean finish with little to no hop character, just mellow malt sweetness all the way through.

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
patricks110 (2413) - Alberta, CANADA - APR 10, 2010
Pretty average amber, but better than the rest of quidi Vidi’s beers. Pour is light brown with a finger of tan head. Aroma of toasted malts and caramel. Taste is nutty and malty. Overall, not too bad.

3.4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 13/20
scrizzz (2223) - Bothell, Washington, USA - MAR 25, 2010
Toasty oats and barley aroma, like breakfast. Oranged amber, sticky clean white head, great lacing. Very sweet, like a treat for horses. No yin to the yang. This is only one half of a beer, though this half is beefy, chewy, and firm.

2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
riversideAK (6140) - Shoreline, Washington, USA - MAR 25, 2010
Old wet leafy nose.some caramel. Pours golden amber, no head. Iced tea, old leaves, caramel, gross sweetness - garbage juice. Wow, god awful.

2.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
hobbersr (690) - Lethbridge, Alberta, CANADA - JAN 2, 2010
Pours a light orange with an off white head. The aroma is sweet and malty. The flavor is loaded with caramel and sweet malt. Meh, just too sweet for me.

2.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
TheJester (2531) - Cavan Monaghan, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 1, 2009
341 mL bottle. Copper red with a small head. Mild aroma of Euro hops, spice and tin. Flavour is stunningly uninteresting, without being offensive. More caramel than hops. Kinda sweet.

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
BillKismet (3839) - Seattle, Washington, USA - AUG 11, 2009
Light amber with plushy head. Nice subdued maltiness in the aroma with a whisper of wood-aged vinegar. Medium malted body. Decent, malty amber ale, if non-descript.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
after4ever (7577) - Brier, Washington, USA - AUG 9, 2009
12 oz. thanks savvy! pours crystal clear light amber with no head or lace. buttery, slightly sour, bready nose. flattish medium body. reedy, woody, leafy, buttery mid palate. long dry finish.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Savvy1982 (1705) - Lethbridge, Alberta, CANADA - JUL 31, 2009
Bottle. Pours medium amber with a thin off-white head that quickly reduces to a razor-thin ring, spotty/ropey lacing. Nose is soft caramel malt, buttery corn-on-the-cob, grass, tired hops. Flavors of grassy hops, citrus, malt. Seems a bit buttery on the palate, as well as a bit caramelly thanks to the malt. Nice, appropriate amber ale that I wouldn’t say no to if I ever should find myself in Newfoundland.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
VertBaconStrips (2317) - Blerkablerka, NIUE - JUN 13, 2009
I cellared this for three months to bring out the finer qualities. Nice amber beer with decent carbs and a small rocky tan head with some slippery lacing. Aroma ok with biscuity malts, some dark fruit, a touch of stink and the slightest hint of smoke - that’s probally due to the brewery being forced to use cigarette butts in the filtering system because of the failing economy. Taste was really good. The hops were a bit too strong but mixed in with the malts it’s not bad at all. The malts are not the best but there enough of them to give a good ammount of flavour overall. There is a faint hint of oxydization but nothing to slice your wrists over. Mouthfeel is weak and a bit on the rough side. There is a bad tasting bitter aftertaste. My belch sounded like rocks getting pulzerized with a sledgehammer.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3  4  5 6 7 8 9 10 11


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50