JasonG (776) - Salt Lake City, Utah, USA - JAN 15, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Yellow color, white head, some bubbles. Aroma is slightly sweet. Flavor is a little sweet upfront, a little malty. It has a little more flavor than the standard BMC, but not much. Palate is too thin.
rabuc (143) - carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 14, 2004
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
nothing special to the look of this beer. another weak, watery beer. i won't buy another one.
MrRomero (1976) - Nolanville, USA - JAN 12, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pours light yellow with light hair care product aroma and flavor. Thinly hopped with thin malty and a light grape flavor.
tennmonkey (11) - USA - JAN 12, 2004
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
This is the beer I drink at a bar, when I want to impress the ladies. It's slightly sweet, not too yeasty. It's sort of like Purple Haze's little brother.
I like it, MON.
Zeswaft (1505) - Charleston, South Carolina, USA - JAN 10, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
it gives you a weird like sweet taste. um, pretty clean, best part is the bottle. um pretty clean, like i said. worth a try.
dprior (118) - Somerville, Massachusetts, USA - JAN 7, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
This is the first time I've ever poured it out of the bottle so I could rate it. It's a cloudy gold color that doesnt have a very good aroma. Taste is average not much to report. Much more ffulfilling if you drink it in the bottle while talking about how funny the commercials are
ukoolaid (576) - Amherst, Massachusetts, USA - JAN 5, 2004
2.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Yellow with a nice white head. Sweet aroma (not good sweet). Taste is actually decent compared to beers like bud.
FlacoAlto (4045) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - JAN 5, 2004
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
A lightly hazy gold color with a thick white head. There is a sweetish grainy aroma, basically a typical cheap lager type aroma. It is sweet up front and it begins with a crisp ending in the finish, but then gets a bit rancid; a bit of buttery diacetyl here. This one is slightly offensive for a macro-swill, though not overly so. A very lackluster beer, and the rancid finish does not help.
TheGreatKen (76) - San Diego, California, USA - DEC 30, 2003
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
It is not a crisp as the other lagers that I had before. It resembles more of a weak Dixie Lager. It does have a little malty sweetness to it. The body and head are normal for a lager.
MrBeer (276) - Erie, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 26, 2003
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
A decent beer is all you can call this. I didn't mind drinking a few but stay away from drinking a lot of these. Nice aroma with an okay appealing taste.