RateBeer
overall
6
58
style
Brewed by Desnoes and Geddes (Diageo PLC)
Style: Pale Lager
Kingston, Jamaica

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 2246   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.17   EST. CALORIES: 141   ABV: 4.7%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
First brewed in 1938.
It is a light alcohol drink with not too strong bitterness but rather soft taste; therefore, it’s easy to drink it up.
Brewed for the UK market by Charles Wells since 1976.
Brewed for US market at City Brewery’s Latrobe plant since 2012.


2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Skrip99 (82) - Los Angeles, California, USA - MAR 11, 2002
Not a daily beer, but a good beer here and there. Cool bottles. Interesting AS flavor.

3.3
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 8/20
HammsBear99 (22) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - MAR 8, 2002
It is a nice beer if you want a change. I wouldn’t drink it all the time though.

3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 14/20
Davhgbrew (947) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAR 7, 2002
Maybe it’s because I had a few before this one, but I didn’t think it was that bad. I remember I had this beer a few years ago, and I remember hating it. This time I found it very drinkable and actually enjoyable(as far as American style lagers go.)

2.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
AxeMaster221 (343) - Portland, Oregon, USA - MAR 6, 2002
Way better than i expected and i love the stubby bottles, vaguely remember american beer in those when i was really little

3.8
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 16/20
noy-zee (63) - Minnesota, USA - MAR 6, 2002
jamaica a good beer, mon!

2.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 13/20
tourette (222) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAR 4, 2002
Pretty good, but not that special. Better than the average american macrobrew, but still not great. It has a bit of a spicy taste of some sort that I like, plus its smooth and refreshing. Not worth the high price, but better than many in its class.

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
estoppel (1028) - Buffalo, New York, USA - MAR 4, 2002
They should stick to growing marijuana or practicing on the bobsled, mon, or, maybe, possibly, bringing their incredibly overrated and overpriced coffee back to what it supposedly used to be, mon.

3.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
dertay99 (1) - gastonia, North Carolina, USA - MAR 3, 2002 does not count

3.8
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
darkvibe (68) - Rochester, New York, USA - FEB 28, 2002
I like the painted on label. Taste was good, but not great, better than the average macrobrewery. Little head.

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
Drinkingdan (375) - East Norriton, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 27, 2002
Nice and surprisingly good!


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 211 212 213  214  215 216 217 » 225


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50