Rosebud butternuts (2396) - Denton, Texas, USA - MAY 21, 2008
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Sorry that i even brought this to my brother Swalden_28 to sample. color is somewhat amber. retention, this beer doesnt know what retention is. I dont suspect that i will be trying this beer again.
onceblind (6102) - Denver, Colorado, USA - SEP 6, 2011
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Clear light gold, with a small fizzy head. Smells like smoky corn, slightly better than typical macro lager. Taste is wheaty, slightly woody, but otherwise very bland and corny sweet. Better than Bud or corona, but still a waste of time.
rumproasts (4290) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - AUG 26, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
bottle. light amber with minimal head. iím just happy that i donít have issues with gluten. this isnít terrible, but itís certainly not good. not much flavor except for a strange aftertaste. slightly sweet.
AlabastorJones (814) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JUL 25, 2007
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
if i were typing something that made sense, something that wasnít really all about a toothless armadillo hanging gently in a weeping willow, it would certainly not be a review of this beer. gnartoons.com
Panzuriel (1558) - Westerville, Ohio, USA - AUG 14, 2007
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Sour beer with some very interesting flavors previous reivewer had it spot on with grass and rice. Not good in the least. stay away.
lb4lb (2580) - Austin, Texas, USA - AUG 15, 2007
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Ok, I basically got this to fulfill the "specialty grain" category, but I probably shouldíve waited for a rye beer. This sucked. Poured clear copper with little head that disappeared fast. Very little smell and what little there was, smelled of a kind of non alcoholic beer type maltiness. (Think Kaliber) Wow, taste is bland, and an immediate watery finish. Only slightly better than the time you held up your newborn baby after their first bath you gave them in the sink, when they accidentally peed on your face. Only that was "cute".
PlainsDrifter (90) - Adelphi, Maryland, USA - APR 24, 2008
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
This is a very bland beer with a slight metallic taste. I am sorry I bought it.
Cavie (4043) - Fort Worth, Texas, USA - DEC 17, 2009
1.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle poured into a Rahr Anniversary footed pilsner glass. Clear copper orange appearance. Smells musty. Some grain is apparent though Iím not entirely sure which as it is gluten-free. Light adjuncts but overall easy aroma. Taste is distressing! Sharp bitter hits you upfront with a ugly cough medicine aftertaste. It is difficult to swallow this as it does not feel in the least bit pleasant. Also has a distasteful linger on the back of the throat, like antiseptic. Oh my Rahr glass, what have I done to you?
DarkSong (335) - Dacula, Georgia, USA - MAR 16, 2010
1.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
12 oz bottle. Pours a golden color with a very small white head. This beer doesnít have any taste good or bad. It tastes like highly carbonated beer flavored water.
jmagnus87 (2912) - Rockford, Illinois, USA - MAY 12, 2011
1.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
From a 12oz bottle from Pick;s Liquors poured into a Tumbler. Minimal amount of white head, no lacing. Color is a rusty orange. Aroma is slightly offensive, a bad stinky yeast. Taste is slightly sweet and slightly salty, not much of anything to speak of. Light bodied with a thin texture, it does have fizzy carbonation and no finish to speak of. Overall, itís a below average beer. Nothing I would buy again.