Palidor19 (3143) - Brandon, Florida, USA - FEB 15, 2007
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Iíve tried to review this from the point of someone who cant have regular beer. It feel like its not worth to someone who has an intolerance to Gluten. The aroma is almost non-existent, taste of Sorghum makes for the unpleasant. hops are a falling taste.
dwyerpg (5456) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - MAY 13, 2007
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Not much aroma. Taste is funky fruit and sourness. Not something I would recommend to anyone other than those that have to drink this stuff.
dpjuart (1103) - Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 28, 2007
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
12 oz. bottle courtesy of Naka. Pours straw yellow with an amber twinge. Thick, white, rocky head with a touch of lacing that quickly dissipates. Fruity nose, lemon and grapefruit with a big dose of caramel. Sweet, sweet taste, caramel there, with fruity flavor, pear, apple. End is weird, lots of flavors . . . fruit, bitter, metallic, with a lingering metallic/bitter after. Thin mouthfeel, little carb. Tastes like cider. Better than I remember from my first encounter, but still bad.
Rosebud butternuts (2396) - Denton, Texas, USA - MAY 21, 2008
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Sorry that i even brought this to my brother Swalden_28 to sample. color is somewhat amber. retention, this beer doesnt know what retention is. I dont suspect that i will be trying this beer again.
coyforce (684) - California, USA - MAR 20, 2010
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours an amber color with an off white head. Tastes very sweet and almost a shock to the taste buds. Aftertaste lingers about 10 secs and is kinda sour.
onceblind (6746) - Denver, Colorado, USA - SEP 6, 2011
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Clear light gold, with a small fizzy head. Smells like smoky corn, slightly better than typical macro lager. Taste is wheaty, slightly woody, but otherwise very bland and corny sweet. Better than Bud or corona, but still a waste of time.
rumproasts (4828) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - AUG 26, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
bottle. light amber with minimal head. iím just happy that i donít have issues with gluten. this isnít terrible, but itís certainly not good. not much flavor except for a strange aftertaste. slightly sweet.
pkbites (857) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - APR 22, 2016
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle. Lovely red pour with zero head, zero lacing. Little aroma of stale bread. No malt. No hops. Almost no flavor. What taste there is reminds me of something "diet". Itís not that this tastes bad, itís that it doesnít taste at all. Like flat Bud Light with red food coloring added. Sorry, but if you canít handle gluten maybe beer isnít for you anyway.
AlabastorJones (814) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JUL 25, 2007
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
if i were typing something that made sense, something that wasnít really all about a toothless armadillo hanging gently in a weeping willow, it would certainly not be a review of this beer. gnartoons.com
lb4lb (2583) - Austin, Texas, USA - AUG 15, 2007
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Ok, I basically got this to fulfill the "specialty grain" category, but I probably shouldíve waited for a rye beer. This sucked. Poured clear copper with little head that disappeared fast. Very little smell and what little there was, smelled of a kind of non alcoholic beer type maltiness. (Think Kaliber) Wow, taste is bland, and an immediate watery finish. Only slightly better than the time you held up your newborn baby after their first bath you gave them in the sink, when they accidentally peed on your face. Only that was "cute".