RateBeer
overall
20
19
style

bottled
available

on tap
available

Local Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 469   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.68   IBU: 24   EST. CALORIES: 159   ABV: 5.3%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Redhook Blonde combines the best attributes of a flavorful golden ale with the refreshing qualities of a lager. The ale is brewed with three different malts and two hop varietals. Lightly roasted barley and a touch of wheat, combined with an ample portion of hops, creates a truly crowd pleasing beer . Redhook Blonde pairs well with medium flavored foods such as fish, nachos or salad. Available year round.

Style: Golden Ale
ABV:5.3
Malts: Pale, Wheat, Caramel, Carapils, Munich, Vienne
Hops: Willamette, Saaz
Color SRM: 7.4
Bitterness Units: 24 IBU
Original Gravity:12.8


2.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
ravidesai (947) - Bombay, INDIA - JUN 26, 2002
a light sweet beer, pleasant drinking on a hot day but nothing interesting. disappointing from RedHook - theyt probably brewed this to cater to the mass market

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
MaxPower (961) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - JUN 22, 2002
Nice appearance,water not much flavor, weak.

3.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
Flatline99 (36) - Durham, North Carolina, USA - JUN 22, 2002
A good beer for a hot summer day or night; nothing spectacular, but insanely drinkable.

2.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
muzzlehatch (4424) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - MAY 29, 2002
At first glance, I wonder why all the really low marks; a decent looking beer, light orange and vaguely cloudy with a full creamy slow-diminishing head. Then I smell it; grainy but in a stale, rice/corn sort of way, and not at all sweet. Flavor actually is sweet and somewhat malty, a bit better than the nose lets on, but certainly nothing special. Finishes with, well, basically no finish at all. Ends is more like it. Yeah, probably the weakest beer from this mediocre pseudo-micro; best consumed a 6-pack at a time after a really good beer or two.

2.2
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 2/20
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - MAY 28, 2002
I can’t help but notice that this is the lowest-rated of Redhook’s (sorry, Budhook’s) mainstream, readily-available beers. Then I tasted it and understood. It’s on par with the Peroni I had earlier in the night...and that’s NOT a good thing. This should be renamed ’Adjunct Ale’. The bottle says ’A compelling endorsement may convince us to feature you in an ad.’ Sorry, guys. I’m not your man!..........Turning to the beer itself, it has hints of corn?, rice?, I’m not really sure, but it’s a typical American Blond Ale. ’Nuff said.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 6/20
joet (2219) - Santa Rosa, California, USA - MAY 17, 2002
Like an extra west coast pale ale, but soft, undefined hops.

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
Steak (124) - New York, USA - MAY 17, 2002
What is the purpose of this beer? To give the big macro drinkers something to not be afraid of trying? If so, then this beer is exactly that, a marginal improvement over beers with far less pedigree.

2.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 8/20
Aurelius (4355) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAY 10, 2002
Nothing really to commend this beer, especially at its pricepoint. Aroma is citrus-hoppy, with a little of musty smell that I associate with wheat beer. Generic appearance, screw-off cap. Flavor is faintly ale-ish with a mild orange/rock candy tinge. Medium hopping. There is an unpleasant metallic undertaste and aftertaste.

1.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
hennes (934) - Fountain, Michigan, USA - MAR 22, 2002
So someone brought a bunch of redhooks to the st.pats/maple sugaring party i attended recently and i sampled the redhooks during the next afternoon cleanup. Appropriate time for such beer - garbage time. This one is particularly pathetic. it smells like beer, but comes on like Killian’s lite. Ugh. Especially not good foe use as a hair of the dog remedy.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
BillKismet (3360) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAR 21, 2002
Blonde as advertised--bleached blonde to be precise. The expected light mouthfeel with a metallicized flavor. Nothing to impress me.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 41 42 43  44  45 46 47


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50