Indra (2530) - Overland Park, Kansas, USA - MAY 28, 2001
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: SEP 24, 2003 Pretty average Blonde. Not bad beer, though. On the same scale with, say, Killian's.
proc (342) - Dearborn, Michigan, USA - MAY 18, 2001
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
I was given a couple of six packs of this from a buddy who works for a local beer distributor. I wasnít expecting much from it as I think that other Redhook products are good, but nothing super special. I must say though, this is a very refreshing, light ale. I can recommend this one after working in the yard, after softball, etc. A good thirst quencher.
Oakes (11031) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JAN 5, 2001
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: MAY 14, 2005 Had a Redhook Blondesicle at Dallas-FW airport. It was all right once I let it warm up.
opiate (199) - Sandy, Utah, USA - DEC 15, 2000
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
A nice beer with a good light malt flavor and aroma. Pretty good head retention and carbonation. Has a great grainy smell and flavor. I really like that in a beer. I think it must be hard to acheive in lighter ales, but they did a great job. This beer reminded me of a light helles bock or something along those lines. Overall a good beer. And I think a good one to introduce beginners to ígoodí beer. Itís not intimidating because it almost looks like a Butt Light...but itís definitely got more flavor and aroma.
karl (158) - Glendale, New York, USA - NOV 18, 2000
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
jamidwyer99 (49) - Oregon, USA - JUL 4, 2000
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20