MrRain (472) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - JAN 21, 2008
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
agree with dins, not bad, not good, just a lager. I good foreign beer for AB and Miller fans.
Ramenen (466) - San Salvador, EL SALVADOR - FEB 12, 2005
1.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
A cheap beer that will do if you do not have any other choice. There is no taste at all so at least you quench your thirst on a hot sunny day.
6ROW (461) - corpus christi, Texas, USA - MAR 14, 2010
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
yellow pour with a small white head, standard lager beer taste and aroma. this is one more to try in the home land.
BeerAteHer (384) - St. Paul, Minnesota, USA - APR 23, 2005
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Got this because of the unique bottle shape and the fact that I’ve never had a beer from El Salvador. Well, if they’re like this then I never will AGAIN! Poor, sickly appearance -- a very weak pee color and a large head that disappears almost immediately (many drainpours seem to share the latter characteristic). Brown bottle, nevertheless manages to hold a great deal of skunk (though not overwhelming) in the flavor and the aroma. Essentially, flavor and aroma differ little from each other: some skunk, some cheap malt, some cheap tobacco papers. Finished a little more than 1/2 and had to throw the rest out.
Norton (333) - Southside, Richmond, Virginia, USA - JAN 24, 2011
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle Found this in a large bottle ($2.99 for 32 oz) at the local Latin American-influenced Sunoco station close to my home. Pours nice gold, with hefty head. Smell and lacing reminds me of "old school" Schlitz or something my parents drank in 70’s. Decent malt flavor. Honestly nothing bad about this beer. I will get it again. Great drinker for football Sundays. Balanced carbonation. A pleasant surprise!
ChrisPants (317) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - DEC 20, 2004
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Despite appearances, this is not a beer for drinking on a warm day. This is a beer for washing your car with. The aroma is redolent of urea and warm skunk. The palate is bitter with no redeeming qualities of flavor. The bottle may look cool, but I recommend passing on this one and just buying a Colt 45 or an OE if you’re looking for volume.
dins (266) - Texas, USA - DEC 3, 2001
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not bad, not good, just a lager.
joekinty (263) - rockledge, Florida, USA - JUL 3, 2008
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
why did i ever buy this shit has to be the worst shit I have ever tasted taste like rotten corn qand rice no body no head just a dirty little whore
tone77 (256) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 22, 2012
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Has a pale yellow color. Smell is of corn, some sweetness. Taste is crisp, light, some corn and grains. Overall a beer probably best enjoyed in the tropics.
uhorpheus (215) - houston, Texas, USA - DEC 19, 2002
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 15/20
Nice beer, but a little bland like ameircan light beer. Interesting fruity flaovor, not sure where its from. Overall not bad for the cheap price, if I want a cheap American beer, I’ll take this any day instead since the price is about the same.