ohknaks (44) - USA - NOV 11, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
for a "low carb" beer not too bad. For a real beer however, very little taste. Not one I would buy again.
ChainGangGuy (4272) - Marietta, Georgia, USA - DEC 30, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Appearance: Pours a clean, simple yellow-hued body with a very small, very thin, white head.
Smell: A little sweetish sniff of cereal-scented malts with a flimsy hint of grains.
Taste: Sweet cereal maltiness, near nil hop flavor and imparted bitterness. A lick of grains. Finishes a bit sweet and lacking crispness.
Mouthfeel: Thin-bodied. Medium-light carbonation.
Overall: The ’Extra’ in Rhinebecker Extra doesn’t stand for flavor or enjoyment.
rubbishystuff (1734) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUL 10, 2010
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
I haven’t had any other Low Carb beers. So maybe it is great for a low carb beer? It just tasted like a water but not terribly offensive light beer. Serving: Bottle
kp (10886) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - SEP 1, 2007
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
clear yellow with a big white head, sweet malt aroma, thin but respectable body, nice light sweet malt flavor, touch of hop flavor and bitterness, a quick and tasty quaff,
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 5/10; Flavor: 5/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 10/20
The score was calculated based upon the notes and an old scoring system.
Headbanger (2859) - Aurora, Illinois, USA - MAR 15, 2007
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
12oz bottle- No aroma on a slight cloudy golden body. Taste of a little malt, perfume, and finishes with a little bitterness. Not a big fan of low carb nor am I a fan of this.
frankenkitty (1958) - Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA - JUN 4, 2006
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Clear & golden with light carbonation under a foamy white head that left some watery lace. Dusty aroma finds a faint whiff of hops. Palate is not as thin as I expected while the flavor finds a pleasant balance of ingredients, starting malted and finishing bitter. A decent low-carb offering... one that I’m inclined to buy for my diabetic mom so she doesn’t stock her fridge with the likes of Michelob Ultra.
<font size=-4>From bottle at <a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Place Restaurant and Beer Garden, LaGrange, IL 60525<font size=-1>
JFGrind (1799) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 1, 2005
1.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
It may have 2.5 carbs, but it also has zero aroma. Zilch! Golden body, fleeting head. 11.2 ounce bottle is all filler no killer.
DocLock (7421) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 6, 2005
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle. Gold pour with typical slight hopcit/thiol aromas and tastes. I thought I was done with pale lagers.....I guess I’m stuck with them until the NC 6% beer law goes away.
Cornfield (5326) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - MAY 28, 2005
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Just what the world needs - another low carb pale lager. This golden, headless wonder has a perfumey aroma with a hint of malt. It tastes perfumey, too... which is not a good thing. The aftertaste is a bitter metallic one that leaves you running for that next brew - - - anything but one of these.
wilkie (1208) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - FEB 2, 2005
1.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle. Golden, pale, with a tiny white head. Little aroma. What
a crappy beer. The stuff they brew at Coors is better than this garbage.
Watery, and flavorless. Just crap crap crap!
Simon (42) - Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA - JAN 31, 2005
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
This beer is very light and even watery, but manages to retain decent lager flavor. When compared to other low-carb beers, this one is exceptional. Recommend to your friends who are drinking Michelob Ultra.