presario (4426) - Stampede City, Alberta, CANADA - OCT 16, 2002
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A perfectly average macro. Quickly disappearing head. No aroma. Macro bitterness and slightly higher than average hops. Why did they not stick with the Red?
radiomgb (2143) - Peterborough, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 24, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale gold colour, really light and watery, once again it seems like they changed the Red and came up with this.
chunknuts (51) - Watertown, New York, USA - SEP 21, 2002
4.8 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
this beer is delicious. when i went to kingston i had to try it. why because my last name is rickard. i have drank alot of beer before and next to any and all keystone products this is the best beer i have ever had. it was so delicious that after a long night of drinking i went to the bar at 11 am and consumed a whole 60 oz. pichter of it for breakfast i even chugged it out of the pitcher it was so delicious.
dhurtubise (568) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 22, 2002
2.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
One of the few good molson products. I was pleasantly surprised when I first had this one. Not really a true pale ale because of the munich? malt. More ípungentí then the other molson products.
Erol99 (24) - Ontario, CANADA - AUG 5, 2002
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Better than the Gold. Weak but tasty
Went down easy, but Iíd rather have the Red.
Radek Kliber (6287) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - AUG 4, 2002
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This one was tasted and rated in one of the pubs of FCP Toronto. The restaurant/pub service was lousy but they got nice selection of beers. There was few of us that tried this one. I must say it was split 50/50 some ppl did not like it some love it (those guys were not raters of ratebeer.com). My opinion on it was following. It is nice to have something like this after whole day of work as a refreshing drink but it was slightly boring and please do not try look for something more in it. Simple brew with out any specific character.
Aggie80 (776) - Michigan, USA - JUL 29, 2002
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pale gold color. Thin apperance in both visual and flavor department. Not one that Iíll repeat.
P-tor44 (886) - Anchorage, Alaska, USA - JUL 14, 2002
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
no nose. Golden in color. thin and sticky, hops are very mellow, not much. poor choice for my first Canadian lunch beer.
DougShoemaker (3147) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 11, 2002
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Nice sweet aroma, pale amber,slight head. Malty flavour, pleasantly bitter. Fair cabonation, good after taste of malt, average.
WastedYouthBrew (143) - Phila (Home of Geno's Steaks), Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 9, 2002
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Good light version of Rickards Red, Cheeseman and I always bring along a sixer of these when we go fishing.