BytownJon (23), Ontario, Canada
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 | Mar 31, 2009 The marketing Gods have struck me down with the Rickards 10/10 White/Red pack for $26 at the Beer Store.
The White is remarkably adequate and refined. Attractive aroma and appearance, cloudy, but not too much so. Just a tad weak on the flavour and palate but considering the price - pretty darn good!
ZTO (17), Alberta, Canada
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | Dec 27, 2009 on tap, colour is a cloudy orange. properly poured, has a thick airy head that retains fairly well. as far as aroma, honestly, didn’t smell like anything, at first, then somehow got some diluted orange out of it as it warmed. tasted like an abundant amount of orange (why oh why is it served with an orange slice) and a hint of grapefruit, with some coriander that was only apparent with decent sized gulps. pretty poor for a wit. mouthfeel was decent. aftertaste was apparent as, again, a diluted orange with a very small bit of chalkiness? for a drinkable beer, its, well, pretty well drinkable. DeanF (332), Paris, France
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Dec 23, 2009 Served at a steakhouse in Vancouver’s suburbs, with an orange slice of all things. No real head, hazy yellow colour, okay aroma but nothing too interesting. Great thirst-quenching taste with fruitiness and some citrus notes. An above average hefeweizen. TheHulk (156), Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 1/5 | 10/20 | Nov 25, 2009 After I got over making fun of this and got down to rating it was actually pretty decent. The smell has only a slight maltiness, nothing too much and missing the heavyness of a real wit. It really does look the business, very hazy, cloudy, quite pale and a good head. There is a complex orangy taste initially but after the malt wears off midpalate there is nothing there to support the rest of it. If you didn’t drink REAL beer this would seem like it was great, but there is NO bottom end. It needs some hops or alcohal or SOMETHING JaBier (1294), Capital City, Ohio, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Nov 23, 2009 12oz bottle. Clear yellow pour with a medium white head. Sweet malt nose with yeast and lemon. Malty flavor with orange and lemon and a weak finish. swiseman (210), Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Nov 16, 2009 cloudy, orange appearance. slight head. aroma is strong citrus - maybe artificial? also strong citrus in taste. For a macro, it does an ok job of following style. mcberko (179), British Columbia, Canada
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Oct 14, 2009 Updated: Jan 1, 2010Pours a crisp golden yellow. Aroma is wheat and citrus. Flavour is citrus, orange and yeast. Better than Rickard’s Honey Brown, but not Red. UM02 (23), Quebec, Canada
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Sep 13, 2009 Considering it is brewed by Molson this is surprisingly decent, probably their best beer. It is at least closer to being a real witbier than most of their other beers are to the style they are labelled with. Make no mistake this is not one of the better witbiers on the market but it is at least something enjoyable to drink which I can not say about many Molson products. In comparison to the better witbiers it is a bit thin but there is a definite taste of wheat and citrus. To be honest I have tasted worse microbrew witbiers than this. As a mass production brewery if Molson could at least raise the level of their other beers to this standard I would have a little more respect for them.
|