blackflag321 (444) - Lansing, Michigan, USA - JUL 11, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Like a previous rater, the label on my bottle calls this a premium lager. Bottle pour into lager glass. The cheap price and the high ABV made me apprehensive and the orange-gold color and lack of carbonation did not help.
It was not as bad as I feared. Very slick, heavy palate; sweet corn taste with a dull alcohol finish. I agree with the rater who dubbed this an imperial malt liquor.
maxwelldeux (3084) - Everett, Washington, USA - JUN 9, 2012
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Aside from having what is possibly one of the greatest labels I’ve ever seen, there’s not a lot that’s good with this beer. There is a lot of sweetness in this one without getting that weird lager taste. Golden color with no appreciable head.
dwyerpg (4356) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - MAY 17, 2012
1.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
I have to wonder if my beer is actually a new twist on this beer. It has After on top, Before below, and it says Premium Lager and 1%, which doesn’t match with the rest of this. Looks like most of the rest of these beers. Boy, the headache is her, and I still have another beer from these guys to go tonight. Tomorrow is going to be tough. :(
boozedude (1619) - Des Moines, Iowa, USA - APR 25, 2012
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Butterscotch aroma... Pours orange wuth white head...just ok...for as strong as ut is you cant tell...
Jndubbs (120) - Austin, Iowa, USA - APR 25, 2012
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours like warm piss, doesn't taste much better. Smoother than most beers that strong. Not for me
patrick767 (3407) - fort wayne, Indiana, USA - APR 21, 2012
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
bottle - Pours clear, deep orange with a minimal head. It smells of indeterminate malts and alcohol. The flavor is really sweet with obvious alcohol presence and a warming finish. This really isn’t a very good beer. I expected terrible though. It’s not terrible.
kp (10886) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - FEB 25, 2012
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Date: January 05, 2012
Source: Ale Atlanta
Appearance: hazy gold, fine off white head, bits of lace
Aroma: sweet candy malt aroma, hint of chocolate, light spicy hops
Flavor: sweet malt flavor, malt candy, not much else
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 6/10; Flavor: 5/10; Palate: 6/10; Overall: 9/20
Score: ** /4
Scrapersnbeer (1434) - Boston, Massachusetts, USA - FEB 21, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Triple Bock, eh? Doesn’t look like a bock beer of any kind - it is hazy neon orange, like an electric plastic pumpkin. Syrupy fruit and booze nose. Tastes overly sweet and even tart. It might be bitter, but that’s more likely just alcohol. I would never say a beer has too high a volume content, but this one lacks enough other elements to support it boozy aura. More like a poor Belgisch-pretender than German lager. Still better than most big brand malt liquors though, and that’s where this one belongs.
pepsican (1419) - @ $13.99, Iowa, USA - FEB 20, 2012
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This beer. My god. Gold pour with a big head, lots of bubbles...Aroma is very grainy, some grapes, a bit of floral hops maybe? Flavor is fun, minus the alcohol. Ok maybe it’s not so great. Huge alcohol in the lingering malty finish, very sweet too. This one was a bit rough even for me.
tgncc (2664) - Bellmore, New York, USA - FEB 5, 2012
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I think I’m rating the correct beer. What I have here doesn’t really equal a dopplebock. The aroma is sweet, caramel, corn, booze. The appearance is orange, white head. The flavor is like the aroma, very sweet, corn, other adjuncts, some caramel. The finish is sweet, boozy. Medium in body, slightly thick. Drinkable, but not good.