RateBeer
Home >

Rio Claro Premium Lager

 (RETIRED)
overall
6
47
style
Formerly brewed at Cerveceria Centro Americana
Style: Pale Lager
Guatemala City, Guatemala

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 27   MEAN: 1.95/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.1   EST. CALORIES: 123   ABV: 4.1%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Available at Fine Retail Stores. This Gold Medal winning formula makes Rio Claro the perfect compliment to good friends, good food and good fun! Rio Claro exhibits powerful shelf presence with impactful "Brand" packaging and provides an excellent alternative to other Mexican style beers.

Before 2006 it had 3.9% and was brewed by Constancia in El Salvador


2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
bhensonb (11360) - Woodland, California, USA - MAY 27, 2007
My bottle produced by Ceveceria Centro American, S.A., Guatemala. Grassy aroma; not too bad. Pale gold with a subtstantial white head. Starts with a carbonation bite, followed by corny malt. A bit sweet. There is some bitter at the finish, but not quite enough to balance the sweetness. Slight herby aftertaste. Not really all that clean a finish. Better than Bud.

1.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
Braudog (5864) - Glenville, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 6, 2004
Medium yellow with the standar American head. Fruity aroma. Crisp and stark with little falvor to speak of. Previous "like Schlitz" review was spot-on.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 3/20
Pailhead (5024) - Brownstown, Michigan, USA - JUN 4, 2009
Bottle: Sweet pale lager aroma with the slightest hint of grass. It pours a transparent gold (not yellow) with a half-inch white head that diminishes to to a thin film after a minute or. Itís actually a decent head for a pale lager and leaves some decent lacing. The flavor has some sweet apple (slightly sugary sweet apple juice flavors) with a hint of pale lager sweetness as well. The finish has the slightest hint of grassiness. Iíd say itís sweeter than most other pale lagers. Light bodied and a little thin with mild carbonation. Certainly not good, but itís not offensive and you can definitely do worse. However, if I was in a bind and it was the only thing available, I donít think I could drink a lot of these as the apple sweetness would probably get to me after more than one bottle. Appearance inflates the score in relation to BMC beers, but if I had to choose multiple bottles of a BMC beer or this, Iíd choose a BMC beer.

1.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
BillKismet (3355) - Seattle, Washington, USA - APR 24, 2002
This beer has the sparkling lager look, with a well carbonated-solid gold color. Sweet-skunk pilsner smell feintly wafts up the glass. Despite the carbonated appearance, this beer felt relatively flat and flavorless--a bit of pilsner sweetness carries what little flavor exists--just not much taste character in this beer. A smooth lager, but highly forgettable.

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
mjg74 (2492) - La Mesa, California, USA - AUG 27, 2004
Skunk-O-Rama. Smell watery and skunky. Tastes grainy and skunky with a little hint of metal. Lousy brew.

2.1
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
GG (2319) - NorCal, California, USA - JUN 16, 2009
Not sure what the difference is between this and Nautica Especial. It even had a similar packaging color. But the beer is pretty much identical, except for a few % points of alcohol. Body is straw yellow, 2" fluffy head and crystal clear. Aroma is slightly grassy and some skunk character. Flavor has some undefined sweetness to it and not much else. Body is watery and light. Didnít expect much from the beer, and didnít get much from it.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
joet (2199) - Santa Rosa, California, USA - JUL 20, 2001
Very pale and clear with fat sticky foam. Lightly hopped with an easy body. Relative to other Latin American beers, itís well-balanced and bright. Very nice.

2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
BeerLimey (2154) - California, USA - FEB 10, 2002
Lightly hopped, but pretty much flavorless brew. Not a bad budget choice and Iíd probably pick it up before drinking Moosehead or Corona.

2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
fordest (2010) - Santee/San Diego, California, USA - SEP 26, 2007
Not as bad as I had expected for another Latin American beer. Going for that Corona customer, and it was cheap. For me, it got me that Guatemalan rating. Not horrible for a pale lager that needs a bit of lime.

1.6
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 6/20
MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - AUG 6, 2002
Light golden color, so pale it looks like youíre pouring water. Head was at least big and foamy. Typically skunk-ish nose. Flavor is better than expected, as it has some hops and the maltiness gives a slightly refreshing sweetness.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50