1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20Pours a clear straw color with a medium diminishing white head. Aroma of grainy malt with honey sweetness. The flavor has a boring mix of malt and sweetness. The palate is light and oily with moderate carbonation. Boring.
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
A nice clean crisp and flavourful larger. This one was quite refreshing, enjoyable.
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Claire, limpide, mince, peu à pas de mousse. Couleur dorée assez franche. Palette olfactive limitée aux céréales et une timide pointe de houblon. Prémisse sucrée, liquide mince qui est dominé par des relents d’orge. Simple mais goûteuse, malgré une finale à l’opposé : un peu salée, sèche et pétillante. Un peu trop simple en nez, un peu trop salée en conclusion, la Tremblay se classe dans la haute moyenne des blondes sans personnalité, sa principale qualité étant son caractère en bouche. Malheureusement, elle passe totalement inaperçue en situation d’analyse.
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
On tap at La Distillery (Montreal). Pours a clear yellow gold with average-sized white head. Weak grainy aroma and flavour. Lightish body. Meh.
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Haven’t drunk this beer a single time since I got a job, which will probably tell you more about what you’re in for than any description of the actual flavour, which is malty, not super-bitter, maybe a little corny, but completely forgettable. You are making a grave mistake if you bother pouring this one into a glass--this is meant to be swilled straight from the bottle, and quickly. Besides, the complete lack of head makes it look like hell. Makes me a little nostalgic, though; I’ll give it that.
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
On tap at le saint bock as ecole buissonniere.
Pale yellow pour, no head. Aromaof cheap cereals, corn and zero hops. Watery mouthfeel, low carb. Finish is cooked veggies, and cardboard with wet grass. Awful.
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: AUG 19, 2012 Je crois qu’elle n’est pas si mauvaise, je lui ai donné une deuxieme chance et je trouve qu’elle est vraiment meilleur que certaine bière, mais ce n’est pas dans mon top 10 nonplus.
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Tastes aight for a lager. Shit, better than our typical big biz Canadian trash. Some grain taste up in this muthafuka. Big boo-tay.
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
pours clear yellow with a small white head, little retention. light malts, grains, light herbalness. aggressive carbonation, light body, very short finish. bland.
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Originally rated May 2005. This is another lager that is easy to get around here, and that I buy from time to time. It pours a golden colour with underpar carbonation. The head doesn’t stay long, and the lacing is minimal. It smells bitter and slightly malty. The taste is a bit bitter with a smooth cereal finish. Decent lager, but prefer the Sleeman Silver Creek lager (reviewed also tonight).
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Clear orange colour with a thin white head. Smells of vegetation and corn with some hay. Thin light body with heavy carbonation. Taste of grass, malt and hops with no aftertaste. Light taste of hay. Felt a bit like cereal.
|
