hockeybeerguy (1943) - Juneau, Alaska, USA - JUN 13, 2014
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Well, uh...okay, hereís a copy of the other review.
Iíve had this in a pint glass. The appearance was a super light clear yellow color with fast carbonation trying to fill a rapidly dieing less than a one finger white foamy head. Lacing, what lacing, there wasnít any. The smell, what smell, there was barely anything there. Perhaps, some light cooked corn, wow, if you can even actually pick that up, youíre better than me. The taste was semi-sweet and super watery through the aftertaste and finish. The palate, well, uh...its light and sessionable. Overall, okay, well, if anything, it fits the style. Is it good for me? Hell no. Used to like this stuff after a hockey game, but nowadays, Iíll look for other stuff.
jtclockwork (8214) - , New Jersey, USA - MAY 6, 2014
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle -etched glass- backlog. Pours gold with white head. Nose/taste of grain, sweet corn and light grass. Light bodied. Nothing going on.
edgallow (2000) - nashville, Tennessee, USA - FEB 10, 2014
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
12 oz bottle pours golden with a white head. Aroma of grains, malts and grass. Taste is watery, malts and grass.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
BMMillsy (1325) - Florida, USA - DEC 5, 2012
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Just gross. Managed to make RR even worse. Nice job guys. We didn't even touch this in college.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
kramer (4903) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 24, 2012
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle. Pours a clear straw yellow body with a very minimal head that completely vanished. The nose is sweet corn and a light touch of hop extract. The flavor is pretty well all corn with a watery finish. Tastes a bit more like your average Euro Lager than the usual BMC macro stuff. Light bodied and watery with fizzy carbonation. Not exactly a great beer, but I can stomach this a lot better than Coors Light or similar.
beermanusa (77) - California, USA - MAR 7, 2012
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
No body, no aroma, no taste. Might as well drink a bottled water which is not a bad alternative.
seymour (1413) - Maplewood, Missouri, USA - OCT 28, 2011
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 1/20
Sampled directly from bottle, thanks to a friend on an Atkins diet. Typical weak, mildly offensive aromas and flavors of an adjunct light lager. Even less color, aroma, flavor, body and alcohol than regular Rolling Rock, which is hard to believe would be possible. Barely beer.
halfonit (1164) - Fall River, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 24, 2011
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
This is similar to the regular Rolling Rock. The only difference between the two is that this is a little more watered down and carbonated. Besides that, I donít even need to describe the flavors and aromas. Just read my regular review on it.
wlajwl (3813) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - JUN 30, 2011
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Adjuncts and sweet-cornish in aroma while the appearance anemic yellow. The flavor is mildly sweet and can taste the adjuncts. A typical macro lager, not undrinkable, though not worth trying again.
Thorpe429 (5012) - , Illinois, USA - APR 14, 2011
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Reviewed from notes. Poured into a pint glass.
The pour is a faint golden color with a two-finger white head that dies down quickly and there is no lacing to be seen on the glass. The nose is a bit of grainy husks and some light grass. The taste is really off and astringent. My goodness is that bad. Peels over to the feel and is just wrong. Does not taste good and has a horrible feel; this is just a bad beer and Iím glad itís retired.
Serving type: bottle
Reviewed on: 11-14-2010