Onslow (1078) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - JUN 2, 2010
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not sure if this is the same beer... Bottle says "Rock LIght" and "10" - the word íGreení does not appear anywhere. But, it clearly is not a 2003 vintage brew... Claims 49th parallel hops and roasted malt contribute to its flavor. Pours light yellow with a thin head. Weak corny aroma. Flavor is a little sweet corny grain and a slight mineral water taste in the finsih. OK, not bad, nothing notable though.No mention of it being low carb on this bottle - I drank a six pack and my stomach isnít any flatter, so maybe it is not low carb...
CaptainTitus (18) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 13, 2010
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Rating 11- I hate original Rolling Rock and this beer is even more disgusting to me. It really tastes like almost nothing except watery, carbonated, spoiled apple juice.
kp (10886) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - DEC 22, 2009
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: JAN 2, 2010
Date: June 06, 2008
Source: Total Wine, GA
Appearance: pale yellow, fine white head, streaks of drippy lace
Aroma: light cereal aroma with light floral hops
Body: thin body
Flavor: grain flavor with a touch of sweetness, balanced by floral hops, light bitter finish
Overall: not much to it
Aroma: 3/10; Appearance: 5/10; Flavor: 3/10; Palate: 4/10; Overall: 5/20
Score: * /4
SuIIy (1983) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - SEP 23, 2009
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Pours a crisp clear yellow color with a small bright white head. Nose is lacking anything really, just smells fizzy and corny. Palate is thin and watery. flavor os water, some light corn notes.
Fratto (2510) - Arlington, Texas, USA - SEP 14, 2009
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Another green skunked beer that Anheuser-Busch bought in order to produce more of the same.
bopper24 (1) - USA - SEP 2, 2009 does not count
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I enjoy this beer very much. I like regular Rolling Rock a lot more. This is a good alternative to Miller Lite.
DrnkMcDermott (2738) - Downers Grove, Illinois, USA - AUG 26, 2009
1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
12 oz. bottle. Just 5 ratings from a new Best Beer Month Everô and Iím wasting it on cheap lite beers. Hey, I gotta recalibrate after GTMW. So this has a surprisingly grainy smell, although on second sniff, itís more like feed corn. Color is strangely off, very light, but somehow brownish. To paraphrase Douglas Adams, the taste is "something thatís almost, but not quite, entirely unlike beer." Like drinking diluted corn mash mixed with Malto Goya. Plain unpleasant.
CUJO (383) - Brooklyn, New York, USA - AUG 18, 2009
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is definitely not as good as its older brother, however for a light beer its not terrible.
ben4321 (3473) - Hoboken, New Jersey, USA - JUL 1, 2009
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I remember when they released this think it was going to be Rolling Rockís Michelob Ultra, and that I donít like Michelob Ultra much, and I donít like Rolling Rock as much as Michelob, so this was going to be a disaster...Well I was at a bar right after it was released where they were giving it out for free (it wasnít close to being my first drink that night either), and it was bad. Since then I have attempted to avoid it, but have had a few since, still never good, do yourself a favor, skip this one.
Rciesla (5499) - Exit 15W, New Jersey, USA - APR 30, 2009
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Pours a pale yellow body with a white head. Very thin body grainy and nearing tastelessness as you approach 0 degrees Celsius. Feels like someone stole everything i like about my brew from it.