wlajwl (5845) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - JUN 30, 2011
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Adjuncts and sweet-cornish in aroma while the appearance anemic yellow. The flavor is mildly sweet and can taste the adjuncts. A typical macro lager, not undrinkable, though not worth trying again.
Thorpe429 (5016) - , Illinois, USA - APR 14, 2011
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Reviewed from notes. Poured into a pint glass.
The pour is a faint golden color with a two-finger white head that dies down quickly and there is no lacing to be seen on the glass. The nose is a bit of grainy husks and some light grass. The taste is really off and astringent. My goodness is that bad. Peels over to the feel and is just wrong. Does not taste good and has a horrible feel; this is just a bad beer and Iím glad itís retired.
Serving type: bottle
Reviewed on: 11-14-2010
rougeau13 (2631) - Richmond, Texas, USA - JUL 30, 2010
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
UPDATED: SEP 6, 2010 this is a waste of time. Itís a typical crappy green bottle light beer with not body aroma taste or other redeeming value
beernovice39 (3270) - Idaho, USA - JUL 25, 2010
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
UPDATED: NOV 8, 2010 Pours a crisp clear yellow color with a small bright white head. Nose is lacking anything really, just smells fizzy and corny. Palate is thin and watery. flavor os water, some light corn notes.
Onslow (1410) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - JUN 2, 2010
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not sure if this is the same beer... Bottle says "Rock LIght" and "10" - the word íGreení does not appear anywhere. But, it clearly is not a 2003 vintage brew... Claims 49th parallel hops and roasted malt contribute to its flavor. Pours light yellow with a thin head. Weak corny aroma. Flavor is a little sweet corny grain and a slight mineral water taste in the finsih. OK, not bad, nothing notable though.No mention of it being low carb on this bottle - I drank a six pack and my stomach isnít any flatter, so maybe it is not low carb...
CaptainTitus (18) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 13, 2010
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Rating 11- I hate original Rolling Rock and this beer is even more disgusting to me. It really tastes like almost nothing except watery, carbonated, spoiled apple juice.
kp (10883) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - DEC 22, 2009
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: JAN 2, 2010
Date: June 06, 2008
Source: Total Wine, GA
Appearance: pale yellow, fine white head, streaks of drippy lace
Aroma: light cereal aroma with light floral hops
Body: thin body
Flavor: grain flavor with a touch of sweetness, balanced by floral hops, light bitter finish
Overall: not much to it
Aroma: 3/10; Appearance: 5/10; Flavor: 3/10; Palate: 4/10; Overall: 5/20
Score: * /4
SuIIy (1983) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - SEP 23, 2009
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Pours a crisp clear yellow color with a small bright white head. Nose is lacking anything really, just smells fizzy and corny. Palate is thin and watery. flavor os water, some light corn notes.
Fratto (2845) - Arlington, Texas, USA - SEP 14, 2009
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Another green skunked beer that Anheuser-Busch bought in order to produce more of the same.
bopper24 (1) - USA - SEP 2, 2009 does not count
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I enjoy this beer very much. I like regular Rolling Rock a lot more. This is a good alternative to Miller Lite.