fauskie (11) - USA - APR 18, 2007
1.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Was not very happy with this beer at all. I bought for around $5 and was expecting better. Beer has an orangish-tan appearance and had a decent head after initial pour but it didnít last long. The taste was not very desirable. It wasnít very bitter but it left an astringic like taste on my palate. After taste was equally unpleasant and Iím not looking forward to finishing the rest of the pint!
BudWeiser (10) - West Linn, Oregon, USA - SEP 19, 2007
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
22ozíer. Yep itís a malt liquor...just like the bottle says. However when forced to drink something like this....I would pcik this beer over a Mickeyís or King Corbra or an Old E. Goes down easy and smooth. No hot flavors or anything like that. Nice carb and very clear golden in color. For itís style I would say itís good.
WBC (8) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - APR 25, 2006 does not count
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Aroma: All bubblegum sweet corn with no hops.
Appearance: light gold color with no lacing or retention.
Flavor: Weak and thin with hardly any body(Not what I expect from a Malt liquor).
Palate: I think this is leaving me with the feeling I need to open another beer to actually taste something, thereís nothing happening in this beer completely one dimensional!
Overall: An unbalanced beer, and in my opinion a less than adequate effort from John and company(Good thing thereís plenty more Rogue to try!).
goswim (3) - Chester, Maryland, USA - APR 23, 2007 does not count
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
I liked it. Of course, this is my first beer rating here, as Iím venturing away from the standard over the counter junk. Iíve bought many new beers, so Iím sure itís going to find itís place amongst my list.
EB (3) - AUSTRALIA - DEC 28, 2008 does not count
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
anyone who says this beer is ok, has to be dying of thirst. i dont know how you seppos drink that horrible rubbish. almost makes me want to pick up a pure blond for less than a 1/4 of the price.
fucking horrible. sweet corn and nothing else. not evan ordinary just rubbish!!
Vango (1) - USA - DEC 31, 2007 does not count
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 1/20
Gross, dude. It smells like homeless people and tastes like dumpster juice. Donít get me wrong, Iíve enjoyed many a tasty beverages from the fine folks at Rogue. Hell, I applaud the attempt. But still...you can polish a turd, but all youíre left with is a shiny piece of poop. Or in this case, liquid poop.
mdawson (1) - USA - NOV 26, 2006 does not count
2.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
I agree with the general consensus here. The beverage is fine...for malt liquor. I thought the beer looked great. The copper color was nice. The aroma was definitely below average and without alot of character. Taste was decent. Sweet and malty with corn and fruit and a tad of hops. It finished with a little more alcohol taste than I expected but Iím not an expert on this type of beer. For more details, I reviewed this beer on my blog at http://mybaryourbar.com/2006/11/25/rogue-dads-litt